The New York Times and the Times (of England) know the full story of the FFP leaks but it's not a story they will ever publish because they are still using the same sources and LFC are more commercially valuable to them than City.All he said was Pep and Klopp have a friendly rivalry. However the execs hate each other going back to the bus being bricked.
Cross followed this up with if a play off is needed for the title it should be done racing the team coaches.
He knows what's going on. I just wish there was one newspaper who says "Fuck em" and uses all the evidence they can. The Scouse threaten to sue and would lose.
But we know what would happen. They would lose media access to them in retaliation and they are shit scared that would make their sales plummet.
I believe the Yanks got Chelsea because they were happy to accept Abromovich demand that Buck stays as CEO. The others said get to fuck. What's so important about Buck and his influence?I'd love one of these journalists to do a good deep dive into the American takeover of the PL. That meeting that Arsenal, Rags and Dipper owners were at didn't get anywhere near the scrutiny it should have had. Their involvement in the Super League thingumabob should also be investigated.
Oh, and there's no way the new Chelsea owner hasn't had some talks with the other American owners and discussed their 5 and 10 year plans for our league (they fucking love their 5 and 10 year plans).
Maybe it will see the light of day soon?The New York Times and the Times (of England) know the full story of the FFP leaks but it's not a story they will ever publish because they are still using the same sources and LFC are more commercially valuable to them than City.
I am surprised though that, apart from Martin Samuel, virtually no one has been in our camp, not least because what has happened behind the scenes with the campaign against City is a fantastic news story.
So true. Nothing sells better than a negative City story because LFC and MUFC fans across the globe love them. It's the only thing keeping United fans going these days.I had the misfortune of listening to a Podcast earlier this week with Delaney Mike Calvin and some other Journo.
When discussing Pep’s comments Delaney spouted his usual sportswashing human rights script, but then finished with the money shot that City get no traction online unless it’s a negative story like the Champs League exit.
And that’s the answer we all know. All the other shit we get is just ingredients for negative story slant that they need for clicks and engagement.
It’s not complicated. Why on earth do they feel the need to deny it when we all know the reason the teams in red get the coverage they do, and why we get the opposite.
Not like the rags have links with any American companies is itYou are forgetting it works both ways, as American own clubs cant get sponsorship from America companies.
The Sun should have done once the City of ‘it means more’ effectively banned them from being sold there
'Major prizes' ...
View attachment 43229
'Major prizes' ...
View attachment 43229
Why is the European super cup a major trophy but the charity shield isn’t? It seems like you either take both or neither.