Hindsight's a wonderful thing.
I presume if we can cancel the contract after the verdict then the final year, worth around £8million, (we gave him a 6 year contract) will be the bit written off.
This line caught my eye:
An impairment charge of £18.7m has been recognised based on an assessment of first team players that are not expected to be a member of the first team playing squad.
I wonder who that could be referring to?
Wait till the trial. Press will blame us.Good shout. I had wiped his existence from my memory as much as possible
£2.2bn before last season was one figure I’m sure I read somewhereIts a lot more ..more likely to just be short of £2B.
That smells about right.£2.2bn before last season was one figure I’m sure I read somewhere
Even better mate.More boiling piss. ;)£2.2bn before last season was one figure I’m sure I read somewhere
And for the salary we’ve paid him while he allegedly committed serious crimes.City should sue him for the money lost.
Thanks for that clarity, makes perfect sense as we don’t sell many players if any at much of a loss. Mangala bring an outlierMendy's value has already been addressed. See the following from @Prestwich_Blue in the thread in January this year about the accounts for 2020/21 in which he quoted something contained in them.
That's almost certainly accounted for in pretty much its entirety by writing off Mendy's value with two years of his six-year deal left. (Six years! What were we thinking?!).
City should sue him for the money lost.
Have they? The rags have finished second as often as they have in "the Klopp era"!They've certainly dominated second place.