Aba452
Well-Known Member
The strangest thing about that BBC story is the claim by Tebas that it is impossible for City to have 68 per cent of revenues from commercial income because Real Madrid get only 54% and the Real Madrid brand is bigger. But City get much higher revenues because of the very high broadcast deals from winning the PL for four out of five years. And TV coverage also generates bigger sponsorship deals. It is dishonest for the BBC to report that dishonest comment without qualifying it. That comment would only make sense if Real played in the PL.
I respectfully refer you to the author of said article: slymon stones, fucking embarrassment of a no nothing Brian Briggs duvet fondler!