25 July. They added another charge at the start of this month (June). It's interesting that they are adding more charges, whilst at the same time there are rumours that the cases could fail.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media Thread - 2021/22
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Pleasure mate. Thought it was refreshing to read a factual article by a financial journalist with no skin in the game, so we’ll worth the share (again)Thanks Maly
Just a polite reminder that it’s not appropriate to comment about on-going legal trials.
Here’s what the Attorney General said last year:
“Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and everyone deserves a fair trial. The issue is really about discussing matters which should only be raised for the first time in front of the jury.
“A mis-judged tweet or post could have grave repercussions and interfere with a trial. A post on social media could mean a trial is delayed or at worst stopped because a fair trial isn’t possible – so I would caution everyone, don’t get in the way of justice being done.
“It is not only journalists or lawyers who can be found in contempt of court, ordinary members of the public can also do so and find themselves facing their own legal consequences.”
Here’s what the Attorney General said last year:
“Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and everyone deserves a fair trial. The issue is really about discussing matters which should only be raised for the first time in front of the jury.
“A mis-judged tweet or post could have grave repercussions and interfere with a trial. A post on social media could mean a trial is delayed or at worst stopped because a fair trial isn’t possible – so I would caution everyone, don’t get in the way of justice being done.
“It is not only journalists or lawyers who can be found in contempt of court, ordinary members of the public can also do so and find themselves facing their own legal consequences.”
laserblue
Well-Known Member
Panja is best described in Urdu as Farja Ka Fahash Name. A tad long winded but it translates into English as ****.At the risk of boring you all silly, panjar in Urdu has a variety of meanings, including rib, skeleton and,,,,,er, frame - something which I suspect red shirt client "journalist" tariq panja knows from his time leaking CAS related shit in the service of his scarlet masters.
Panjar also rhymes with kunjar, which again can mean the name of a clan/tribe, gypsy, nomad, tramp.
The definition of kunjar I've grown up with has always been meaning in a derogatory way, basically equivalent to a ****, twat or wanker. QED! ;-))))
IrishBlueSince92
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2016
- Messages
- 2,922
I’m not sure what’s funnier at the minute.
The clamour from rival fans to prove that Haaland wasn’t a City fan growing up or the fact that Fred cost more than him
The clamour from rival fans to prove that Haaland wasn’t a City fan growing up or the fact that Fred cost more than him
laserblue
Well-Known Member
The press certainly won't refer to him as "Former Le Havre player Benjamin Mendy..."Wait till the trial. Press will blame us.
Can I still call panja a lying ****?Just a polite reminder that it’s not appropriate to comment about on-going legal trials.
Here’s what the Attorney General said last year:
“Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and everyone deserves a fair trial. The issue is really about discussing matters which should only be raised for the first time in front of the jury.
“A mis-judged tweet or post could have grave repercussions and interfere with a trial. A post on social media could mean a trial is delayed or at worst stopped because a fair trial isn’t possible – so I would caution everyone, don’t get in the way of justice being done.
“It is not only journalists or lawyers who can be found in contempt of court, ordinary members of the public can also do so and find themselves facing their own legal consequences.”
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Yes because its the truth.Can I still call panja a lying ****?
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
Correct and always good advice, whether on here or elsewhere.Just a polite reminder that it’s not appropriate to comment about on-going legal trials.
Here’s what the Attorney General said last year:
“Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and everyone deserves a fair trial. The issue is really about discussing matters which should only be raised for the first time in front of the jury.
“A mis-judged tweet or post could have grave repercussions and interfere with a trial. A post on social media could mean a trial is delayed or at worst stopped because a fair trial isn’t possible – so I would caution everyone, don’t get in the way of justice being done.
“It is not only journalists or lawyers who can be found in contempt of court, ordinary members of the public can also do so and find themselves facing their own legal consequences.”
Having been a specialist court reporter for 11 years, a trial can be voided by online stupidity. Seen it happen many times.
That said our WhatsApp enemies are absolutely fucking guaranteed to turn up for Day 1 only when the prosecution’s case is laid out. Just to twist the agenda/narrative knife
They will then only return for the verdict.
Amateurs and crooks. They will rely on PA/Agente France Press for the remainder. Those guys will be there every day
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
Talk now of it going back to SeptemberJuly I think. There was another hearing recently.
A few whispers not cut and dried.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.