Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dear, oh dear.

"... completed a £128 million move to Manchester City this week."

It isn't fucking difficult to get basic facts right. How can we trust his opinion if his facts are wrong?
Pathetic.. why would they quote the buy out clause as the transfer value unless it’s a deliberate attempt to put a negative slant on one of the best ever deals the PL has ever seen .
Total wanker
 
Interesting leaked video/audio of the United CEO saying that the club had not only spent £1billion but they had spent more money than anyone else across Europe.

We know why only City’s transfer values are mentioned and that Grealish’s forename is now £100m Jack. It was never £90m Pogba unless Ive missed it.

Will be interesting to see how this is reported (or glossed over) in the media.

I’m not holding my breath.
 
Pathetic.. why would they quote the buy out clause as the transfer value unless it’s a deliberate attempt to put a negative slant on one of the best ever deals the PL has ever seen .
Total wanker

Contrast that with Liverpool where they are trying to put a good slant on losing Salah for nothing in 2023. How is losing your best player a good thing, there’s some mental gymnastics going on there.

They are desperate to see Haaland fail, only problem is Kevin De Bruyne’ left and right feet will be providing the ammunition for him.
 
Interesting leaked video/audio of the United CEO saying that the club had not only spent £1billion but they had spent more money than anyone else across Europe.

We know why only City’s transfer values are mentioned and that Grealish’s forename is now £100m Jack. It was never £90m Pogba unless Ive missed it.

Will be interesting to see how this is reported (or glossed over) in the media.

I’m not holding my breath.
Or £97.5 million Lukaku. And look how that ended up.
 
Interesting leaked video/audio of the United CEO saying that the club had not only spent £1billion but they had spent more money than anyone else across Europe.

We know why only City’s transfer values are mentioned and that Grealish’s forename is now £100m Jack. It was never £90m Pogba unless Ive missed it.

Will be interesting to see how this is reported (or glossed over) in the media.

I’m not holding my breath.
Did that come out of their supporters attempt to “pay him a visit”? They are joke; be it Woodward, Rooney or the new CEO, they seem to think going round to intimidate someone at their own house is the way to carry on.
 
'Nunez in, Mane out: All part of Liverpool's methodical evolution'


What a fuckin pile of shite article by red tinted glasses wearing , scouse loving and partner of Sadio Mane.
It’s a shocking subjective article on so many levels, would she ever write similar about any other club? Perhaps Mane is going to Germany to put distance between him and his demented partner.
 
I think we need to ask how many of these middle-class people who were part of the study have actually been exposed to Muslims and Muslim culture? If not many, where did they get their anti-Muslim beliefs? Wouldn't be papers like the Guardian now, would it?
I've said this so many times before but the Guardian offers the height of hypocrisy in that regard. At least we know where the Mail, Express, etc sit. They don't exactly hide it.

Whereas the Guardian, the bastion of tolerance, inclusion and respect for others' beliefs, tends to be pretty intolerant when those beliefs don't fully match their own.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, a bit vom inducing reading that isn’t it?
Don’t forget she once said “I didn’t choose to support Liverpool, Liverpool chose me”. Just like all the Glory hunters out there who “chose” the Rags and Dippers, if Coventry had been dominating football at some stage of the 1970’s onwards that’s who they would support.
 
Don’t forget she once said “I didn’t choose to support Liverpool, Liverpool chose me”. Just like all the Glory hunters out there who “chose” the Rags and Dippers, if Coventry had been dominating football at some stage of the 1970’s onwards that’s who they would support.
She’s like a walking cliche in the way she speaks, and she writes like that too. That quote from her you’ve mentioned is a prime example. The hyperbole is strong in this one. With her articles, it’s like she consults Roget’s Thesaurus after each sentence then re-writes it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.