Media Thread - 2021/22

[salfordbluetrue]

and now Pogshite wants £400k a week to sign a new contract , if there is ever a bigger mug football club than the Rags and the vermin that follow them , i have yet to see them.

Pogba is not after a new contract, he is just after a dignified way out that does not damage his image rights, as he is losing his best player image at utd to Fernandes

 

[bluealf]

£90 million was the transfer fee paid but the Agent got £ 40 million it is believed 20 of each and Pogba got a signing on fee believed to be £10 million

Well fair enough but all of that would have been totted up and given as the fee paid for us.

In fact we would have been lambasted for the agent fee alone.

 

[bluealf]

To be fair to sky we are a better run club and will be more professional about releasing info. The rags and dippers use the media as an unofficial tapping up mechanism and the pressurise deals.

Stopped reading after 'to be fair to sky.'

Bollocks to that :p

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

Pogba is not after a new contract, he is just after a dignified way out that does not damage his image rights, as he is losing his best player image at utd to Fernandes

If Pogshite does decide to leave the sinking ship you can guarantee he will not get anywhere near £400k a week , only a prick like Woodward would sanction such a salary to save face , i really hope he decides to stay because the Rags will never win a thing with a lightweight player who is more interested in his own image than the team.

 

[stan bowles]

Didn’t hear him say that when Utd spunked 90 million on Pogba three years ago .

Exactly. City are repeatedly used as the media punchbag for greed, over-spending and excess in football that is never used against any other club. Even Sean Dyche's recent quote about our alleged bid for Kane (a bid which has no foundation to anyone in the public domain) attracted a typically jaundiced response.
Other clubs can spend, spend, spend and it very rarely attracts any negative response.
If, and it's a big 'if', Grealish does sign then I await the avalanche of hostility both to the player and City as a club. Every stick available will be used to beat the club.

 

[Blue Llama]

Exactly. City are repeatedly used as the media punchbag for greed, over-spending and excess in football that is never used against any other club. Even Sean Dyche's recent quote about our alleged bid for Kane (a bid which has no foundation to anyone in the public domain) attracted a typically jaundiced response.
Other clubs can spend, spend, spend and it very rarely attracts any negative response.
If, and it's a big 'if', Grealish does sign then I await the avalanche of hostility both to the player and City as a club. Every stick available will be used to beat the club.

So?

 

[laserblue]

Didn’t hear him say that when Utd spunked 90 million on Pogba three years ago .

5 years ago.

 

[citizen_maine]

5 years ago.

Isn't it time they 'unleashed' him?

 

[mat]

Pogba is not after a new contract, he is just after a dignified way out that does not damage his image rights, as he is losing his best player image at utd to Fernandes

If your losing in image rights to a naked mole rat I'd be wanting out as well.

 

[BringBackSwales]

Latest 2 stories in muen online, (1) City can’t afford Kane if we get Grealish (2) Mendy in last chance saloon. Why are their stories about us always with a negative slant, and those about the rags have a sycophantic cock sucking slant? A rhetorical question