Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
The commentary was right up there with a CL final for a team made up of part timers taking on a big gun, except that it was the rags being lauded as ‘brave’ , heroic blah blah blah. You utter clowns of the media. The only people who are considered brave and heroic are armed forces personnel who storm a machine gun nest.
The commentator cliches that were rolled out yesterday along with the screaming like a schoolgirl when the rags got close to goal made them utterly embarrassing.
Not one mention of the players price tags, as is the usual with us.
BT are a disgrace. If you pay for it, you’re a fool. IPTV is the way ahead.
 
At least the Beeb had the good grace to remind everyone of the Sick Swan at Old Toilet - can you believe that was really TEN years ago??

www.bbc.co.uk

10 years since 'Why Always Me?' - The day Man City beat Man Utd 6-1

BBC Sport looks back at the day when Manchester City beat rivals Manchester United 6-1 at Old Trafford, and Mario Balotelli revealed his now famous 'Why Always Me?' t-shirt.
www.bbc.co.uk
 
CookiesForCream said:
The commentary was right up there with a CL final for a team made up of part timers taking on a big gun, except that it was the rags being lauded as ‘brave’ , heroic blah blah blah. You utter clowns of the media. The only people who are considered brave and heroic are armed forces personnel who storm a machine gun nest.
The commentator cliches that were rolled out yesterday along with the screaming like a schoolgirl when the rags got close to goal made them utterly embarrassing.
Not one mention of the players price tags, as is the usual with us.
BT are a disgrace. If you pay for it, you’re a fool. IPTV is the way ahead.
Click to expand...
And the mute button, never underestimate its importance.
 
Small victories,

How a post gets through referring to City as dirty Arab oil money or words to that effect is beyond me!


Dear BBC Visitor,

Further to your complaint about some of the content on a BBC web site (reference number P42431093), we have decided that it does indeed contravene the House Rules and have removed the offending material.

Thank you for pointing this out to us.

Regards,
Central Communities Team
 
Classic guardian football weekly yesterday covering Tuesday nights games.
City coverage lasted about a minute.

Lars Silvertsen: City were brilliant, Foden was brilliant but no point discussing the financial disparity between the teams cos we've discussed it so often previously. Credit to City because they've used their resources well compared to PSG very well
Gledenning: Bruges total wage bill just £18 million. About the same as KDB.... blah blah

Same old same old.....
 
Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:
Classic guardian football weekly yesterday covering Tuesday nights games.
City coverage lasted about a minute.

Lars Silvertsen: City were brilliant, Foden was brilliant but no point discussing the financial disparity between the teams cos we've discussed it so often previously. Credit to City because they've used their resources well compared to PSG very well
Gledenning: Bruges total wage bill just £18 million. About the same as KDB.... blah blah

Same old same old.....
Click to expand...
And have they followed the same line today when reporting the Rags?
 
Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:
Classic guardian football weekly yesterday covering Tuesday nights games.
City coverage lasted about a minute.

Lars Silvertsen: City were brilliant, Foden was brilliant but no point discussing the financial disparity between the teams cos we've discussed it so often previously. Credit to City because they've used their resources well compared to PSG very well
Gledenning: Bruges total wage bill just £18 million. About the same as KDB.... blah blah

Same old same old.....
Click to expand...

I stopped listening to the Guardian Football Weekly years ago. It's the same old boring tropes. Hilarious that the website finds itself asking for donations when it employs people who have such disdain for the jobs their actually paid to do.
 
Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:
Classic guardian football weekly yesterday covering Tuesday nights games.
City coverage lasted about a minute.

Lars Silvertsen: City were brilliant, Foden was brilliant but no point discussing the financial disparity between the teams cos we've discussed it so often previously. Credit to City because they've used their resources well compared to PSG very well
Gledenning: Bruges total wage bill just £18 million. About the same as KDB.... blah blah

Same old same old.....
Click to expand...

Genuinely the only comment about that game was this from Rushden "I guess the story here ist that Phil Foden is really good at football". That was it. It followed 35 minutes on Liverpool vs. Atletico.

They routinely miss out City in the preview shows if we are playing a bottom half of the table side.
 
jrb said:
Let’s be honest, there isn’t 1 tabloid that is pro City. But out of them all, 3 tabloids stand out for me, the Daily Mail, the Guardian, and the Daily Express.

I give you the Daily Express City headline after the 1-5 away win at Bruges in the CL tonight.

Who f*ck is Will Lancaster.(sourced from News Now Man City)


View attachment 28272
Click to expand...
How can someone write a headline like that after such a controlled dominant win ? have they also forgot how good we were at stamford bridge and anfield lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.