He’s done well so far. Maybe 6/7 out of 10 for his start to life at City.I'm surprised Jack isn't getting a lot more grief from journalists. If they had a wonder onto his thread on here then they would think the majority of fans think he's shit and a waste of money.
It's all bollocks of course, he's settling into a new club with new teammates and coaches with different demands and a whole different way of playing his game.
Of course to the dicks in that thread it's all on Jack because he cost a lot of money and not settling within a few months and not scoring every week makes him a waste of money.
It's probably a good thing I'm banned from that particularly shit thread.
Agree, seems wasted glued to that left hand side, surely he has to move inside asapIn 3/4 years time when we’re KDB-less and Gundogan has declined, we’ll be very happy we’ve got Grealish in his prime.
It is a lot of money but he’s been good so far and will only get better. I’d personally play him through the middle in midfield and Foden wide left but that’s pep’s call.
I think so, I also think Foden beats a man better and has more pace, so works out there on the left.Agree, seems wasted glued to that left hand side, surely he has to move inside asap
Time to try different things that's for sure, we're far too predictable at timesI think so, I also think Foden beats a man better and has more pace, so works out there on the left.
I am going to take stick for this, but I’d be tempted to move Jesus back in the middle and try Sterling wide right on Wednesday.
He should never have come off that right hand side for me.
Here's me thinking it was fascist.Bluemoon is snowflake infested - dissenting voices are silenced. It’s probably also a good thing that I’m banned from the queues thread in case I upset all the fanboys of the bone idle workshy overpaid public sector wastrels. No swearing no aggression no abuse just a different opinion but that was enough to upset the little pansies.
Who’d have thought a simple footy forum would have aspects of a Maoist purge to it.
And if we hadn't been taken over the likelihood is that the council would only be receiving £1m pa or maybe even lessIt does later mention that we still pay 5 million in rent so why spend 5 paragraphs slagging us off when it is clear no one, least of all the taxpayer, is out of pocket.
The Manchester taxpayers have made a huge profit out of Sheikh Mansour's investment in the club and the area. Land donated by City for schools and community buldings, thousands of jobs, thousands of homes, millions of pounds on infrastructure, millions of pounds to sub-contractors, rental of £5m a year, plus huge amounts in business rates. The new arena would not have happened without the Sheikh and that will provide another bonanza.There is a hatchet job on us in todays telegraph. It starts with an attack on the dildo brothers at West Ham and how the tax payer could lose millions if/when they sell the club and stadium. Something they are legally entitled to do by the way as per the original agreement. The writer then decides to include Shinawatras purchase and subsequent sale of City. It basically states that the Sports Council paid for the stadium but didn't see a penny when Frank sold the club !!!! It does later mention that we still pay 5 million in rent so why spend 5 paragraphs slagging us off when it is clear no one, least of all the taxpayer, is out of pocket.
But there isn't the call for that kind of story.During that period our rivals in nearby trafford have provided zero investment in the City of Manchester...not a single penny. They don't even pay their fair share of taxes.
The stadium wouldn’t have been built in the first place without our agreement to be anchor tenants afterwards. Plus the council took ownership of the Maine Road siteAnd if we hadn't been taken over the likelihood is that the council would only be receiving £1m pa or maybe even less