manclad
Well-Known Member
Susan Cadogan @ 1975 !!!It hurts so good.
Susan Cadogan @ 1975 !!!It hurts so good.
Thought everyone knew that tbhThey did it at the time, I believe respect is the reason.
They did it at the time, I believe respect is the reason.
They claimed 54,000 turned out for the dippers game. Well the ground holds 53,394 and the official attendance was 52,591. The media also backed Klopp up regarding some of their players being targeted and the officials allowing Burnley to get away with horrific skullduggery. Last week they were ecstatic about the ref allowing Spurs to kick the crap out of City, claiming it was refreshing to see officials allowing the game to continue.Anyone can vote on the player ratings and I suspect tons of sad rags and dippers go on there to give or players 2s and 3s.
BBC NW News just made a point of saying Anfield was 'packed' but made no reference to our crowd!
NoShall we expect similar analysis from Shamoon Hafeez when £90m man Pogba's replaced by £73m player Sancho?
(I know the question was rhetorical but I couldn't help myself)
It’s just a thought but I’m starting to think the media are a bunch of cunts, great getting back in the ground so I’m feeling mellow.They claimed 54,000 turned out for the dippers game. Well the ground holds 53,394 and the official attendance was 52,591. The media also backed Klopp up regarding some of their players being targeted and the officials allowing Burnley to get away with horrific skullduggery. Last week they were ecstatic about the ref allowing Spurs to kick the crap out of City, claiming it was refreshing to see officials allowing the game to continue.
I have a feeling you may possibly be right.It’s just a thought but I’m starting to think the media are a bunch of cunts, great getting back in the ground so I’m feeling mellow.
LolGuess who got man of the match on the bbc website write up………
I’ll give you 14 guesses and they will all be wrong!
View attachment 24321
I say Holmes, I think you're onto something there..... cunts!It’s just a thought but I’m starting to think the media are a bunch of cunts, great getting back in the ground so I’m feeling mellow.
ah sorry, I misunderstood you :)My original post might not have been clear. I meant that the squad list no longer references Foe or the retired shirt number 23. It used to say something along the lines of ''23 - Retired in memory of Marc Vivien Foe.'' I was just curious as to when they removed this and if there was a specific reason behind it.
Rag centralDunno who does the scores for the bbc, but dippers v Burnley 10 players got 8 (rounding up anything over 7.5). In the City v Norwich game not 1 City player even got 7 and man of the match was Billy fucking Gilmour
The bent ref?Guess who got man of the match on the bbc website write up………
I’ll give you 14 guesses and they will all be wrong!
View attachment 24321
It’s a fan vote. Suspect not many City fans bother with sites like BBC!Dunno who does the scores for the bbc, but dippers v Burnley 10 players got 8 (rounding up anything over 7.5). In the City v Norwich game not 1 City player even got 7 and man of the match was Billy fucking Gilmour