Lol you can almost picture his bottom lip going in that last sentence. Is £900m even correct and how does that compare to other clubs in the last 5 years? If anyone can be bothered checking it.Tiddlywinks
20:04 5 Aug
That's over £900m & counting Fraudiola has spent in only 5 years. 3 leagues, only 1 FA cup and a few tea cups.
The guys actually underachieved! Should be on at least 2 more FA cups, 1 league title and at least 1 champions league(the trophy he was brought in to win) by now.
It's only the 26 City 'fans' who rate him as a good manager. He's nothing more than a cheque book manager.
Lol you can almost picture his bottom lip going in that last sentence. Is £900m even correct and how does that compare to other clubs in the last 5 years? If anyone can be bothered checking it.
For a change Simon Stone was quite constructive with his appraisal of the Grealish deal even mentioning how it was already funded through player sales etc.Haha the comments on the Simon Stone article are just as expected. The BBC comments certainly seem to attract a certain kind of outraged idiot.
The sycophancy towards United is sickening though. "To be fair they earn what they spend but City don't cos empty seats and stuff. They just spend their owners money and cook the books" Same old ill informed shite.
As is "They are turning the PL into the Scottish top flight or Liga". The PL has still been the most competitive top league in Europe in the last 10 years. 5 different names on the trophy, only one club managed consecutive titles(you know who). Look what's happened in Italy and Germany over the last 10 years by contrast.
Where have some of these idiots been anyway? Acting like the PL used to be more competitive. Since when? The creation of the PL and how the Sky money was introduced nearly killed the competitiveness of English football in the 90s. The first 10 years of the PL was one of the least competitive decades in topflight history thanks to United. As we know, the big sly 3 came into being due to unfair advantages(revenue splits) and the financial gulfs looked set to continue to widen, that was with or without foreign owners. I don't get why so many none big sly 3 fans hold this view, is it that they were happy only having 3 clubs to look up at, that were out of reach? They can't claim that would be more competitive either way. Releasing the monopoly the big Sly 3 were starting to have, was the best thing to happen to the PL.
Wait until they start quoting in Zimbabwe Dollars. There won't be enough zeros to fit on the screen.If you scan down the list of articles on Newsnow, they have it as 2 Billion rand.
Spot on. Nobody seemed to have a problem when United were winning 13 of the first 21 Premier League titles and smashing transfer records for fun.Haha the comments on the Simon Stone article are just as expected. The BBC comments certainly seem to attract a certain kind of outraged idiot.
The sycophancy towards United is sickening though. "To be fair they earn what they spend but City don't cos empty seats and stuff. They just spend their owners money and cook the books" Same old ill informed shite.
As is "They are turning the PL into the Scottish top flight or Liga". The PL has still been the most competitive top league in Europe in the last 10 years. 5 different names on the trophy, only one club managed consecutive titles(you know who). Look what's happened in Italy and Germany over the last 10 years by contrast.
Where have some of these idiots been anyway? Acting like the PL used to be more competitive. Since when? The creation of the PL and how the Sky money was introduced nearly killed the competitiveness of English football in the 90s. The first 10 years of the PL was one of the least competitive decades in topflight history thanks to United. As we know, the big sly 3 came into being due to unfair advantages(revenue splits) and the financial gulfs looked set to continue to widen, that was with or without foreign owners. I don't get why so many none big sly 3 fans hold this view, is it that they were happy only having 3 clubs to look up at, that were out of reach? They can't claim that would be more competitive either way. Releasing the monopoly the big Sly 3 were starting to have, was the best thing to happen to the PL.
11 quid? That's good business ;-)We've only paid £89 million. We got £11 from the rags off the Sancho deal meaning we paid the same price as Pogba. ;-)
Didn't they get that CH Varane - £43mWho was the second signing, is that official yet?
They're pissed off because their little Top 4 clique has been broken up by us and chelsea.Haha the comments on the Simon Stone article are just as expected. The BBC comments certainly seem to attract a certain kind of outraged idiot.
The sycophancy towards United is sickening though. "To be fair they earn what they spend but City don't cos empty seats and stuff. They just spend their owners money and cook the books" Same old ill informed shite.
As is "They are turning the PL into the Scottish top flight or Liga". The PL has still been the most competitive top league in Europe in the last 10 years. 5 different names on the trophy, only one club managed consecutive titles(you know who). Look what's happened in Italy and Germany over the last 10 years by contrast.
Where have some of these idiots been anyway? Acting like the PL used to be more competitive. Since when? The creation of the PL and how the Sky money was introduced nearly killed the competitiveness of English football in the 90s. The first 10 years of the PL was one of the least competitive decades in topflight history thanks to United. As we know, the big sly 3 came into being due to unfair advantages(revenue splits) and the financial gulfs looked set to continue to widen, that was with or without foreign owners. I don't get why so many none big sly 3 fans hold this view, is it that they were happy only having 3 clubs to look up at, that were out of reach? They can't claim that would be more competitive either way. Releasing the monopoly the big Sly 3 were starting to have, was the best thing to happen to the PL.