What does annoy me about analysis is how it's too heavily result orientated. We've seen it with City many times (and others tbf), but yesterday it was Chelsea completely outplayed United, who were very limited in their performance.
Because United, who've been very bad lately, drew away at Chelsea, who've been very good, the analysis was how good United were and how bad Chelsea were.
But if Chelsea had scored that chance right at the death of the game and won, the entire analysis would have been how great Chelsea were and how bad United were. When the only difference would have been the outcome of one late shot.
Good point - example being when we lost to PSG away despite playing them off the park. Most of the reports went on about "how Pochettino had won the tactical battle" - really ???? What was his team talk then ???? "OK lads - let's let City have 20 shots on goal and hope to shit that they miss them all tonight". Yeah absolute genius that.........