Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
See the mail are going with a “moneybags city” warning to Newcastle fans. Flop this and flop that. Now don’t get me wrong most fans would probably agree with Bony & Mangala but why the mail need to reference city at all in a negative light is a cynical attempt to keep the bias opinion clear and centre in fans minds.

They could have ran a positive piece showing how much we have made from the academy or the tons of players who have not been flops that led to us dominating the league.

Always negative shit.
 
Last edited:
ninjamonkey said:
Literally every single thing you mentioned has had ample praise afterwards. Bluemoon isn't happy unless every single media piece is gushing about city through the bluest of blue tinted specs whilst shitting on every other team simultaneously.

And even if they hadn't been talked about at all, who cares? Why the desperation for praise from no mark journalists and pundits who we all regularly slag off and say know very little and whose opinions are worthless anyway?
Click to expand...
What you are saying is correct. We don't need every media talking about City but I would hope that our players are recognized from time to time. Its happening more often now because as the media is changing from the same old guard. I just feel for the players that they don't get the recognition they deserve, but hey maybe its for the best!

For example, they just voted Cristiano as player of the month of September?! Does he deserve it? I am not sure he does but maybe I am wrong.
 
wolviedinho said:
See the mail are going with a “moneybags city” warning to Newcastle fans. Flop this and flop that. Now don’t get me wrong most fans would probably agree with Bony & Mangala but why the mail need to reference city at all in a negative light is an attempt to keep the bias opinion clear and centre in fans minds.

They could have ran a positive piece showing how much we have made from the academy or the tons of players who have not been flops that led to us dominating the league.

Always negative shit.
Click to expand...
Nothing about all the flops the rags have signed.
 
wolviedinho said:
See the mail are going with a “moneybags city” warning to Newcastle fans. Flop this and flop that. Now don’t get me wrong most fans would probably agree with Bony & Mangala but why the mail need to reference city at all in a negative light is an attempt to keep the bias opinion clear and centre in fans minds.

They could have ran a positive piece showing how much we have made from the academy or the tons of players who have not been flops that led to us dominating the league.

Always negative shit.
Click to expand...
Don’t suppose they mentioned £24m David Silva, £24m Yaya Toure, £38m Sergio Aguero? No I didn’t think so. Three legends for less than the price of a Pogbad
 
wolviedinho said:
See the mail are going with a “moneybags city” warning to Newcastle fans. Flop this and flop that. Now don’t get me wrong most fans would probably agree with Bony & Mangala but why the mail need to reference city at all in a negative light is an attempt to keep the bias opinion clear and centre in fans minds.

They could have ran a positive piece showing how much we have made from the academy or the tons of players who have not been flops that led to us dominating the league.

Always negative shit.
Click to expand...
Think most Geordies would be more than happy with the return " money bags City' have had on our investments. The rags on the other hand.
 
i wonder what that jealous Geordie twat the one with the beard and tattoos who hates City is thinking now ? I bet he's loving life now and changing his tune. These people make me sick.
 
Lots of comments from jealous idiots on the BBC article about the takeover, many of them banging on about human rights, or City and Chelsea trophies being meaningless.

Strangely, when I replied to a comment about Saudis and state-sponsored murder, my question whether the US has ever carried out state-sponsored murders was removed by the BBC. Why would that be?
 
Semper aggressus said:
Lots of comments from jealous idiots on the BBC article about the takeover, many of them banging on about human rights, or City and Chelsea trophies being meaningless.

Strangely, when I replied to a comment about Saudis and state-sponsored murder, my question whether the US has ever carried out state-sponsored murders was removed by the BBC. Why would that be?
Click to expand...
Including their own Presidents when they wanted a change in direction!
 
BringBackSwales said:
Don’t suppose they mentioned £24m David Silva, £24m Yaya Toure, £38m Sergio Aguero? No I didn’t think so. Three legends for less than the price of a Pogbad
Click to expand...
Or Zinchenko, a 3 time PL winner who cost less than a months wages for some rags
 
Praising individual play or that of a team that isn’t their biggest subscriber won‘t bring in the money. Lots of praise during the match but only the Red tops will be revered afterwards.
 
As well as BBC Studios Ltd the BBC are to launch another station purely for commercial gain without the need to follow the high standards of honesty set, decency and impartiality set by Lord Reith.
It will be called Sally 'n' Marcus Productions.
 
citymad said:
i wonder what that jealous Geordie twat the one with the beard and tattoos who hates City is thinking now ? I bet he's loving life now and changing his tune. These people make me sick.
Click to expand...
Probably thinking who will he get to use the strap on next week?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top