Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
jrb said:
PSG.

Press box.

E87414-CF-BE2-F-4-C56-A7-B7-370-BDB875-A32.jpg


4-C381542-FF22-41-EF-83-EB-2-C2-F4-DCCBCF6.jpg
Click to expand...
Look at Delooney the fucking prick
 
1961_vintage said:
Fully agree Alf. That scumbag is acting as a witness on behalf of Manchester City. Whilst pages of detailed explanations could justify why this the case - the reality is that few if any will look that far. And our enemies in the media are given the perfect weapon with which to attack. It astonishes me that we did not anticipate and take action to avoid this.
Click to expand...
Do you mean recently rather than back in the 70's? What exactly do you think they could have done?
 
Centurions said:
Do you mean recently rather than back in the 70's? What exactly do you think they could have done?
Click to expand...
Recently. And if I knew that I would be earning a shed-load as a corporate legal consultant. In the meantime, and despite being eminently unqualified to offer such guidance, I remain of the same opinion.
 
jrb said:
Well done LongsightM13. Surprised it took forum members so long to recognise him. Fed and watered even after he's attacked the club on so many occasions. It's good to know they club are keeping Delooney onside.
Click to expand...
Didn't realise we had to name him to win lol I got your point from the off though.

After everything he has spouted about us he should never be allowed to cross the threshold, of course, it just makes him a huge fucking hypocrite as well, the dog fucking weirdo.
 
Amazon analysing villa’s penalty shout and trying to sway anyone who’ll listen it was a penalty. Should be asking why was a corner given. Cunts!
 
Feed the Elk said:
Mail online in complete denial that there was a match involving City tonight.
Click to expand...

City did get a mention in the Daily United via a Liverpool slant.

The Daily United couldn't be arsed sending a journalist, instead they used the Associated Press for the article.

Let's face it, the Daily United along with the majority of the other tabloid rags haven't got any time or column inches for City.

1638399925153.jpeg
 
jrb said:
City did get a mention in the Daily United via a Liverpool slant.

The Daily United couldn't be arsed sending a journalist, instead they used the Associated Press for the article.

Let's face it, the Daily United along with the majority of the other tabloid rags haven't got any time or column inches for City.

View attachment 30934
Click to expand...
Hahahaha absolutely fucking laughable
 
BBC Breakfast coverage on just Salah on his own totally out of proportion to the rest of the football. Even von Trapp on his own got more air time than the top two in the league.
Pretty much the same a hour later diluted with Scottish football and a piece on Ellen White in which they even managed to mention City.
The rags play tonight with their world famous new unknown manager...........
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top