I understand the figures have been privately confirmed for Haaland as £51m transfer fee, £30m agents fees, and approx £18m annual salary. All the costs are spread over five years so it will cost City about £34m a year. This is a tiny figure for an organisation with revenues of around £600m year. In any event Haaland's presence will increase our sponsorship revenues by at least £30m plus per year.
So why are some pundits still persisting with the lie (and that's what it is) that Haaland will cost £200m plus. Are they stupid or biased? Why did the same people mock City last year when we sensibly walked away from Levy's absurd demands for Kane?