Media thread 2022/23

[jrb]

She did it.

But how they f*ck she went from talking about the Juventus board resigning, to PSG and City, and then to City fiddling the books, etc.

 

[Manx Blue]

Wow gobsmacked, if that's not defamatory nothing is.Thimg is too with Sly they just keep pushing the boundaries so if city don't challenge "finance cheats" just becomes part of our name and it will appear routinely.

LOL! The Turin Public Persecutor.....stupid thick ****

(Not you Norman!)

 

[bluetonium]

Absolutely scandalous that some trumped up little twerp can say something like that on live TV, and not only not be pulled up on it by the presenter but also supported on the baseless accusations.

She did get one thing right though - there should be punishment. I do hope that my club does something on this occasion, it's an attack not just on the facts and CAS, but also right through to us fans.

I'd even go as far as to say that her and stupid statements like she has made appearing so frequently, and unchallenged, in our media that is why opposition fans sometimes feel emboldened to take a whack at a city fan at the game, or in school.

She needs bringing to account very loudly and very publicly. Expert my arse, she and that air headed presenter have probably done more to put the credibility of female football experts back three decades with those lies.

 

[Tangled up in blue.]

They should. But they won't.
We will just ignore it as usual and it will continue
and it will get worse. The more they get away with the
more they ramp it up. As I have said previously, if someone
on SSN comes out and openly says that City are fiddling the books
then that is what people will believe. If the club do not even bother
to refute it, then obviously it has to be true. Why would you believe anything
else? We really do not do ourselves any favours on the PR front.
What has been said would not get said about any other PL club because
SSN wouldn't be allowed to get away with it. With us they get away with it
every single time. I'm past caring anymore. Clearly the club don't care so
why should we?

We are clearly soft cunts

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Naah, its bollocks.

The Etisalat allegations were time-barred, so CAS didn't even look at them, just dismissed them. Meaning, basically, that the club shouldn't have been charged in the first place. So not guilty.

That said, most of the Etihad allegations weren't time-barred, were investigated by CAS and were all thrown out after the proper evidence was presented. It's a pretty good assumption that UEFA wouldn't have gotten very far with Etisalat either even if it wasn't time-barred. At least, it's a more realistic assumption than the claim we got away with the Etisalat allegations even though the much more serious Etihad allegations were thrown out,

So, relax. None of this "glass half empty" bollocks.

If I recall correctly ADUG did pay the Etisalat sponsorship but UEFA accepted that was later refunded by Etisalat.

 

[Withnail]

As well as our sponsorship partners.

She has basically stated collusion.

As soon as she started the sentence, she tried to walk it back to a degree with poncey wordage, then showed her bias and lack of intelligence, planting both feet directly in the shit.

If it walks like a duck..

The club surely can't let this go, I will be disappointed if nothing is done. Our reputation is already tarnished enough after the numerous FFP negative City articles from Delooney and Co, this latest accusation is not acceptable.

 

[Man-chester copperpot]

The club look at Blue Moon.

Many people on here have email addresses of people at City.

There’s no way the club would miss that.

Here you go. Fire away.

Man City Press Office.

To speak with our Press Office, please contact press.office@mancity.com.

This. Fucking get e-mailing blues.

Fucking sick of Sky Sports

 

[Barcon]

To be fiddling with some of the accounts to make sure it all balances and looks good In terms of valuations and sponsorships. If you are falsifying your accounts and your benefitting from that, then there should be repercussions suffered.

Sky Presenter. Not a level playing field is it.

I thought they were talking about Juventus.
Sorry. Just listened to it again and she was definitely not taking about Juventus.

 

[tregyblue61]

View attachment 62176
Is this right ,and could this be what the Premier League are looking into .

I always thought the vote was never revealed in cases just the decision?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

The notion of some **** from Sky pontificating about level playing fields is too comical for words.