Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Listened to the match on the City website last night
That was a bit of a 'nothing' post', much like the Chelsea keepers attempt to stop the Grealish cross .
Like most City fans, I tend to avoid mainstream media as much as possible with regards City. Generally I listen to the matches on the City website, (particularly enjoy it when our old mate Andy Morrison is the Co commentator.)
Unfortunately it kept 'buffering' last night, so I had Radio 5 as a back up and had to endure Chris Sutton and all his negative, resentful digs. Worse to come, that Ogden geezer was even more bitter and miserable on Sky Sports news!
Have to say though, good old Clive Myrie at the end of the BBC news had a much more pleasant, positive tone when it came to the evenings football result!
 
oh dear. back pages tonight on SSN. its not fair..... city can bring on grealish and mahrez its not fair
They've got a point to be fair - I thought it was a brilliant cup tie and it was impressive and admirable that those plucky underdogs Chelsea managed to keep it competitive having been run off a shoestring for the last few decades.

What do you mean it was a league game...........!?!
 
Now a collections of autocue readers and fanboys who are more interested with being personalities.

95 per cent of the people in the industry are complete wankers and charlatans. Count on one hand the people I would consider friends after thirty years.

Horrible people
Lord Tolmie of That Ilk, such vituperation, such calumny idly thrown at the members of that noble profession, the UK Sports Media, ill becomes you!

Why, only yesterday afternoon upon searching for news of our game against The West End Arrivistes, I found several examples of fair-minded, informative articles regarding our brave Boys in Blue.

For example, the 'Mirror Football' had its preview piece as high as the 43rd item on its page; while the 'Express' had a similar piece in at 38th ('with a bullet' as I think all the young pop-pickers who follow the hit parade nowadays might say..)

And of course, our wonderful BBC Sport reporter did us proud this morning on the 'Breakfast' sofa despite his account of Chelsea's derring-do against the insurmountable, cheating force they were up against, going so far as mentioning that City had actually won the game! Oh, be still my beating heart..!

Fair dos, yesterday afternoon the 'Mail' had no such preview at all but, to be fair to those trusty wielders of the pen of truth, they were probably all active preparing the ground for their post-match reports and follow-ups later last evening..

So, no more of it please or else, sirrah! Otherwise you may find yourself on the end of the finest Toledo steel..!!
 
How much was the goalkeeper that watched the ball roll slowly to Mahrez.

I was watching on sky go and the signal is often rubbish. It's like watching TV with a migraine when that happens. Just as Grealish played the ball the signal went fuzzy and looked an easy claim for Kepa. I was amazed when it turned out we'd scored. The signal kicked back in for the replays and I still think it's a massive keeper error. So weird how he pulls his hand away! Not that I'm complaining, it's great for us!
 
That was a bit of a 'nothing' post', much like the Chelsea keepers attempt to stop the Grealish cross .
Like most City fans, I tend to avoid mainstream media as much as possible with regards City. Generally I listen to the matches on the City website, (particularly enjoy it when our old mate Andy Morrison is the Co commentator.)
Unfortunately it kept 'buffering' last night, so I had Radio 5 as a back up and had to endure Chris Sutton and all his negative, resentful digs. Worse to come, that Ogden geezer was even more bitter and miserable on Sky Sports news!
Have to say though, good old Clive Myrie at the end of the BBC news had a much more pleasant, positive tone when it came to the evenings football result!
Just watched the Sky highlights on Youtube. The bitter old twat Tyler sounded like he had just had some bad news when we scored!
 
Now a collections of autocue readers and fanboys who are more interested with being personalities.

95 per cent of the people in the industry are complete wankers and charlatans. Count on one hand the people I would consider friends after thirty years.

Horrible people
Used to be a somewhat admirable profession back in the day, lots to be admired, bit murky at times, but that came with the territory, can’t imagine many of this current lot getting up off their arses and actually doing some proper investigative work, not sure I’d want them to either, morally bankrupt cunts most of them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.