cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,436
That can’t be right as it makes out the Dippers have spent more than Brentford.
He mentioned something along the lines of the amount of times Chelsea have beaten City. But not so much since our takeover. Nothing about the billions spent by that Russian twat before though. Old **** needs cow boltingJust watched the Sky highlights on Youtube. The bitter old twat Tyler sounded like he had just had some bad news when we scored!
They were fixated on the number of touches made by Haaland until he made two fantastic defensive headers in his own box and the narrative didn't work any more. Why do these TV pundits always look for negative angles instead of just reporting fairly on what is the world's greatest sport. I thought Carragher was terrible last night. The "poor old Chelsea" financial narrative was absurd given they have spent more than us on their squad.At least he is hurting .
When he's got an arsehole like Carragher or Neville co-presenting he is at his worst , but to be fair he should have been put out to grass a long time ago.
Cancel.Cancel your TV licence, unplug your aerial, and still watch 90% of what you probably do, don't support a corrupt City hating organisation.
Spread the word, you know it makes sense.
Behind is the new level again?
Check out Chilli John Carne on Utube, don't have to do anything dishonest, you just need to know how to deal with these scumbags.Cancel.
Telephone no. is on the back of the licence...takes 2 mins. Tell em your moving abroad !!
No detection team any more,BBC are skint !!
That what i was doing before, looking at ways round the dodgy bastards, but now the missus has got a ring doorbell and she just looks who knocking all the time anywayCheck out Chilli John Carne on Utube, don't have to do anything dishonest, you just need to know how to deal with these scumbags.
Connor McNamara on the other hand said that we'd won on our last 4 visits to Stamford Bridge and not many teams do that. I know who I'd rather be listening to on commentary. Soon as I saw it was Tiresome & Spitty on comms for Sky I switched to an alternate stream.He mentioned something along the lines of the amount of times Chelsea have beaten City. But not so much since our takeover. Nothing about the billions spent by that Russian twat before though. Old **** needs cow bolting
Lord Tolmie of That Ilk, such vituperation, such calumny idly thrown at the members of that noble profession, the UK Sports Media, ill becomes you!
Why, only yesterday afternoon upon searching for news of our game against The West End Arrivistes, I found several examples of fair-minded, informative articles regarding our brave Boys in Blue.
For example, the 'Mirror Football' had its preview piece as high as the 43rd item on its page; while the 'Express' had a similar piece in at 38th ('with a bullet' as I think all the young pop-pickers who follow the hit parade nowadays might say..)
And of course, our wonderful BBC Sport reporter did us proud this morning on the 'Breakfast' sofa despite his account of Chelsea's derring-do against the insurmountable, cheating force they were up against, going so far as mentioning that City had actually won the game! Oh, be still my beating heart..!
Fair dos, yesterday afternoon the 'Mail' had no such preview at all but, to be fair to those trusty wielders of the pen of truth, they were probably all active preparing the ground for their post-match reports and follow-ups later last evening..
So, no more of it please or else, sirrah! Otherwise you may find yourself on the end of the finest Toledo steel..!!