Wasn't that before FFPChelsea's owners did just wipe out debt, it's not right and negates all the rhyme and reason of FFP.
Wasn't that before FFPChelsea's owners did just wipe out debt, it's not right and negates all the rhyme and reason of FFP.
I don't know mate - always confused me how abramnovitch could pump unlimited millions in as 'loans' and never fall foul of ffp. PB or SWP's back know how financial stuff works so the may be able to explain.But can the Glazers pay it - surely Directors cannot just pump money into their club - or, as I mentioned before, all the rich owners would do it so that their club can spend an unlimited amount on the best players?
Sky sports…
“Would United be able to compete with Newcastle and Man City Wealth if Ratcliffe takes over”
I think there doing pretty well at the moment, no mention of Chelsea either.
They have spent more than City and achieved far less success. The Glazers never short changed the club, they backed every manager. Rag fans are never happy. LolSky sports…
“Would United be able to compete with Newcastle and Man City Wealth if Ratcliffe takes over”
I think there doing pretty well at the moment, no mention of Chelsea either.
They have spent more than City and achieved far less success. The Glazers never short changed the club, they backed every manager. Rag fans are never happy. Lol