Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
The BBC must have had a good read of a post I scribed in here last night re the absence of a report on our game on Saturday. This dinner time they've nicked a bit from our website about Sergio Gomez, and then when I sat back and waited for a critical comment about the thuggery at Anfield last night they presented fuck all about it! Perhaps it is just another day to bury bad news. I await the 6:30 iteration!
 
Is he a dipper fan? He did try and blame the defender for being too close after all. Perhaps he should get a retrospective red card for invading Nunez's personal space?
Maddock is a total plank if he believes that. Nunez was an absolute disgrace. He should have been done for the first crafty one and the second was meant to connect. If he had just gone head to head, he would have got away with it, but he just took it too far. I think that, ignoring the first incident, the referee got it right. Yellow for Andersen for pushing Nunez in the back and red for Nunez. Got to be a minimum 3 match ban.
 
Maddock is a total plank if he believes that. Nunez was an absolute disgrace. He should have been done for the first crafty one and the second was meant to connect. If he had just gone head to head, he would have got away with it, but he just took it too far. I think that, ignoring the first incident, the referee got it right. Yellow for Andersen for pushing Nunez in the back and red for Nunez. Got to be a minimum 3 match ban.
Did he book Andersen? They didn't show that in the clips, I honestly think that's harsh, all he did was push Nunez's arm out of the way when he was waving it around in his face. The original incident was chest to back to just to let him know he was there and certainly wouldn't normally merit any consideration by the officials.
 
I find the noise coming out of Sly sports (football page) on the death threats to Andersen deafening (not).
I thought they had started a campaign against online abuse and were advocates of this.
Maybe I'm wrong and that they are only interested in racial abuse, whereas death threats to a professional footballer by some cheeky chappy scousers is within the boundaries and classed as light hearted.
BBC have fronted this with an article on their platform so at least its being taken seriously in some sectors
 
Maddock is a total plank if he believes that. Nunez was an absolute disgrace. He should have been done for the first crafty one and the second was meant to connect. If he had just gone head to head, he would have got away with it, but he just took it too far. I think that, ignoring the first incident, the referee got it right. Yellow for Andersen for pushing Nunez in the back and red for Nunez. Got to be a minimum 3 match ban.
Weren’t there 2 crafty attempts before he turned around & nutted him properly
 
Did he book Andersen? They didn't show that in the clips, I honestly think that's harsh, all he did was push Nunez's arm out of the way when he was waving it around in his face. The original incident was chest to back to just to let him know he was there and certainly wouldn't normally merit any consideration by the officials.
Checked the stats and he was booked in the same minute the thingy was sent off. Booked their keeper in the 91st minute for time wasting although doesn't look like any time was added on.

Dippers brought on three subs in 63rd minute, and one in 79th, Palace brought on three subs in 79th minute, one on 63 and one on 88. That's probably at least three if not four minutes that should have been added on. Then there was the sending nonsense plus a dipper goal so it looks like despite booking him for wasting time nothing was added. This will continue until refs have the balls to book a keeper early in the first half and then add on the time.
 
Checked the stats and he was booked in the same minute the thingy was sent off. Booked their keeper in the 91st minute for time wasting although doesn't look like any time was added on.

Dippers brought on three subs in 63rd minute, and one in 79th, Palace brought on three subs in 79th minute, one on 63 and one on 88. That's probably at least three if not four minutes that should have been added on. Then there was the sending nonsense plus a dipper goal so it looks like despite booking him for wasting time nothing was added. This will continue until refs have the balls to book a keeper early in the first half and then add on the time.

whoscored reckons they played 90+5

Match Commentary tab.
 
Checked the stats and he was booked in the same minute the thingy was sent off. Booked their keeper in the 91st minute for time wasting although doesn't look like any time was added on.

Dippers brought on three subs in 63rd minute, and one in 79th, Palace brought on three subs in 79th minute, one on 63 and one on 88. That's probably at least three if not four minutes that should have been added on. Then there was the sending nonsense plus a dipper goal so it looks like despite booking him for wasting time nothing was added. This will continue until refs have the balls to book a keeper early in the first half and then add on the time.

The referee was also culpable in the first half for incorrect timekeeping.

If they can't get that simple thing right, no wonder they also cock up plenty of decisions.
 
Danny Murphy was shouting come on Liverpool in last nights talkshite commentary!
They should be fucking sacked if they can't be impartial.

Played 1 game more for the scouse cunts than Fulham, don't see him waving a big flag for them, of course, he is a born and bred scouser coming from erm Chester.

Never ever forgiven him for advocating booting David Silva out of the game, utter ****.
 
Last edited:
Danny Murphy was shouting come on Liverpool in last nights talkshite commentary!
To be fair, Sam Matterface was much worse. Turned it on just as the sending off happened and it was like Liverpool Radio.
All from Liverpool’s perspective. Murphy actually commented on how Palace we’re trying to play as though he was embarrassed by the one-sided commentary from the ‘professional’ sports commentator.
 
How come livarpool ALWAYS "fight back to earn a point" whilst we are "held to a draw by a solid defence"?! ;)
Because the broadcasting media like the written press are scared shitless of LFC and often work way to hard to avoid criticising them.

Whereas MCFC are portrayed as the pantomime villains who are a much easier target.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top