Nail on head
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media thread 2022/23
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
When did they install those?Restricted views ? Are those the seats that face the pitch ?
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
They need to make up their minds here, are we artificially inflating income and profits thereby voluntarily increasing our tax bill, or are we pulling tricks to dodge tax?Just as well we inflated our income to pay more tax elsewhere
The perfect fumble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 24,303
to be fair he says to get the etihad upgraded to get it as good as the likes of spurs and the the emirates? The Abu Dhabi bit is naughty though.
That headline is loaded....
"Abu Dhabi"
"Splurge"
"Get Etihad on par with rivals"
Kompany Car
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Sep 2015
- Messages
- 3,570
It’s utter bobbins then. You can’t give an estimate (unless you’re a dodgy builder) which has any worth and stands up to scrutiny, unless you define the level of uncertainty.Dan Niedle the guy who did the research is incredibly thorough and accurate. He’s basing it off the amount of agents fees paid and the amount paid via dual representation, which is public data.
I think the estimate is because you can’t know for certain how what the fair value or agent services are to clubs for each signing.
The reporting is a problem, not the actual research IMO, although IMO it’s an overreaction to a debatable grey area.
I’m pretty sure though, that if he did give a value, it would undermine the way they have been ranked.
It's assuming the agent works on behalf of the player and not the club and should therefore be paid by the player.It’s utter bobbins then. You can’t give an estimate (unless you’re a dodgy builder) which has any worth and stands up to scrutiny, unless you define the level of uncertainty.
I’m pretty sure though, that if he did give a value, it would undermine the way they have been ranked.
That's a reasonable assumption, it's probably near 100% accurate, but you can't know for sure, so he's couched it by saying it's an estimate.
The guy investigating this is the guy who brought down Nadhim Zahawi, he's not manipulating figures to make City look bad, his target is the Conservative government.
No, its our players restricted view of Spurs goal.Restricted views ? Are those the seats that face the pitch ?
citymad
Well-Known Member
Ha! coupled with our defenders restricted views of Kane and Son.No, its our players restricted view of Spurs goal.
the allegation is the avoidance relies on bogus payment schemes to player agents and is thus tax evasion which is not legalI thought tax avoidance was a perfectly legitimate passtime for the rich and famous.
Ask Rishi Sunak and all his mates in Parliament. Who gives a fuck.
Franny 1234
Well-Known Member
It's easySee the BBC running a story about PL clubs saving 250 million in tax and no surprise names us 1st before Rags, Arsenal and Chelsea then much lower down the artical mentions us 1st again then throws the Dippers in.
They also state Chelsea were the biggest savers but we know what the BBC are like with their bias, why not list in Alphabetical order or Chelsea 1st as biggest savers but they put our name 1st twice.
Wish we would just ban the BBC and refuse to do MOTD interviews
Just don't watch bbc and don't read any of the bullshit . It worked for me years ago. CTID
- Status
- Not open for further replies.