Media thread 2022/23

[Centurions]

Still in at this point, linesman looking right down the line, the will of the media to discredit everything City is just obsessive.

You're talking nonsense, unless you add the statement "and that's a fact" then it can't possibly be true.

 

[Gingers Dad]

I grew up in Chorlton. Was always about 50/50 blue and red. Far from being traditionally red

Same. Longsight is more red than Chorlton

 

[Gingers Dad]

Depends. Trad chorlton was very Irish and so lots of reds. Busby, Best etc lived there
Estates like Merseybank and Nell Lane/Arrowfield were more blue

Chorlton was always about 50/50. Joe Mercer also lived there.

 

[heslops barnet]

See that pig Rudd voted for Odegaard over the Viking in Football Writers Association men’s footballer of the year, she hates us…….

 

[Gingers Dad]

I wonder which bellend voted for Rashford?

 

[schfc6]

Wenger? Not in the clip I saw. I think the quote you are referencing was on the day of the game. This one is the day after:



So, the technology is called Piero and Richard says it's not definitive/100% accurate. Listen to Wenger though. I just wasn't aware this wasn't his first reaction to seeing it. That kind of makes it worse in my opinion.

He does understand why VAR couldn't go back/intervene and that there is no real time technology like there is goal line technology though. He wont admit it but he has a chip on his shoulder about City, you can feel the resentment coming through.

Very worrying that a man who’s been in the game for so long and carries such a reputation within the game can be so
fucking clueless.

 

[Moss Side's Finest]

Wenger? Not in the clip I saw. I think the quote you are referencing was on the day of the game. This one is the day after:



So, the technology is called Piero and Richard says it's not definitive/100% accurate. Listen to Wenger though. I just wasn't aware this wasn't his first reaction to seeing it. That kind of makes it worse in my opinion.

He does understand why VAR couldn't go back/intervene and that there is no real time technology like there is goal line technology though. He wont admit it but he has a chip on his shoulder about City, you can feel the resentment coming through.

For me it's more about the time and effort they are expelling on an incident they can do nothing about. And the fact that they seem to be entering into any debate with the firm mindset that they didn't want the goal to stand, regardless of the rules. It is plain as day to see that these pundits all dislike city and wanted Real to win the game. The interesting thing for me is, why? And once again it will almost definitely come back to the propaganda being driven against our owners.

 

[remember arthur mann]

2018.Why buy Haaland for 4 mill when we could get Lukaku for 75 mill...lol.

 

[blue b4 the moon]

Very worrying that a man who’s been in the game for so long and carries such a reputation within the game can be so
fucking clueless.

He's not clueless, he's like in the movies where people 'dance for money'.

He'll talk shite for cash.

 

[Mr Fraser]

He's not clueless, he's like in the movies where people 'dance for money'.

He'll talk shite for cash.

Who owns bein? Explains all