The only real issue I have with that article, is that he continues the myth that Liverpool needed to overperform in order to match us. Especially because he mentions United now having similar revenues to City, a couple of paragraphs earlier, when Liverpool are also in the same ballpark.
Both clubs have had similar revenue, and transfer spending and wages over the time the two clubs have been winning things have been close. You could easily argue that both teams have overperformed, given the points totals they've posted, but this suggestion that someone Liverpool were covering up our advantage is ridiculous.
Anyone who knows football, must realise that Pep is the reason why City are ahead of United, Liverpool and Chelsea in recent seasons. The money puts all those clubs above everyone else, but good management and good recruitment, and an absolute obsession with winning every single minute or every single game, is what separates City from the other big clubs right now.