Media thread 2022/23

jrb · 12 Jun 2023

Not the best picture TBH.

Stern and lack of emotion looking. At that moment.

Exactly what the City hating media want to see.

At least the picture taker got the money shot and won't have to work for the foreseeable future

The Future’s Blue! · 12 Jun 2023

Get fucked you sad sacks, understand what we’re all about and then come back back with your red top bias,

They are angry that we pushed them our, I’m fucking loving it.

sd33 · 12 Jun 2023

did anybody see the times article how they sent reporter in uae expecting fireworks and there wasnt any from sheikhs

The Future’s Blue! · 12 Jun 2023

jrb said:
Not the best picture TBH.

Stern and lack of emotion looking.

Exactly what the City hating media want to see.

At least the picture taker got the money shot and won't have to work for the foreseeable future

View attachment 82907

Is that when they all had to stand for the CL shite national anthem?

Elbow beards · 12 Jun 2023

Pure racism no more no less. How many yank owners now?

SebastianBlue · 12 Jun 2023

The Viking said:
It's behind a Paywall...

The Viking said:

I find it odd that you registered in February, have only 52 posts, and more than 20% of them are just posting links to takedown pieces of City.

SebastianBlue · 12 Jun 2023

Your monthly reminder to…

STOP POSTING LINKS TO NEGATIVE ARTICLES ABOUT CITY

If you must share them for some reason, post a screenshot (of only the headline and summary paragraph, anything more will be deleted to avoid copyright claims against the forum).

Posting the link just gives them more engagement, which is exactly what they want, only serving to incentivise more negative articles in the future.

I am convinced that half of the negative articles written about City get most of their engagement from City fans rage-sharing them on here, Twitter, Reddit, and elsewhere.