I'd say you did. I even said to my missus thank fuck I wasn't sitting through that with the game still in the balance.
As I recall, Tony O'Donoghue started things off with a hatchet job review of City's season that ended on the (paraphrasing here) "doubts surrounding City's legitimacy" or some such bollocks.
A five to 10 minute discussion ensued with Brady sneering all the way through. Absolutely no nuance whatsoever. Proper cuntish jibes. Couldn't get at the football, so he went for the man sort of thing. I mean how the fuck can you criticise a party for employing legal advice for a court case? Churned out the trope of City handpicking the bench too. He knows that's bollocks.
The other two were more balanced in fairness. Sadlier surprisingly so - albeit far from waving a City flag wth glee. He hasn't always been in the past but I suppose it's a sign of intelligence to learn enough to consider the counter argument. So fair ply to him on that.
At half time, they were critical of City (fair enough, we didn't play well although, it *felt* like they were mostly thrilled to see us struggling ). Between them, they offered not one glimmer of promise for our second half, preferring repeat how poorly we were playing and to talk up Inter's chances. Bacto then to Ronnie bastard Whelan on co-commentary for another 45 minutes of his constant cheerleading for whoever City play...
I didn't watch what they said at the end. The hurling as starting and that can't be missed. By then, I didn't care for their congratulations (or otherwise) anyway.