Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes it’s a male prostitute.

How far does this go, shall we ban people singing “where were you when you were shit” because it discriminates on age?

Our society has become pathetic with people being offending about stuff.

But they somehow are not offended by the £100 billion of tax payers cash being divided up between Bonking and his cronies. You got it right pathetic.
 
No I’m not, stop using silly internet words that children use.

I’m not the one linking calling Chelsea rent boys to gay people generally, he is and now you are.

If one of our players came out as gay I’d applaud him for doing so, I’d still call Chelsea rent boys and I don’t think he would be arsed.
So a polite question is met by abuse. You're amazing at deciding what people actually mean for someone who seems to be ever so slightly homophobic. You don't have any mirrors in your house do you.
 
Literally as we speak on Sky Sports they’re bringing up injuries as an excuse.
United have one more ‘injury’ than Liverpool - Ronaldo, to make 9.
There’s also Greenwood ‘injured’.

Are Sky following up with how ETH is performing miracles by doing even better than the best goalie, best defence, best midfielders, best attackers, best coach and most knowledgeable fans, with their only 8 injuries?
 
Think modern footballers should grow thicker skins, the Kippax would constantly accuse George Best of being both a homosexual and a transvestite. Watfords chief backer was accused of being a follicley challenged rent boy. They took it in good part and was regarded as bants and the world didn't end. At the West Lancs Derby on Saturday the racist ( town full of p*** s) and homophobic ( town full of benders ) abuse seems thankfully to have stopped. However both sets of fans were singing about getting guns and killing each other is this any better. Going to watch Fleetwood play Forest Green tomorrow, can I call them dirty vegan bastards or are people's diets protected by the woke these days.
Beans, beans the musical fruit
The more you eat the more you toot.
 
United have one more ‘injury’ than Liverpool - Ronaldo, to make 9.
There’s also Greenwood ‘injured’.

Are Sky following up with how ETH is performing miracles by doing even better than the best goalie, best defence, best midfielders, best attackers, best coach and most knowledgeable fans, with their only 8 injuries?
Cell door closed on his fingers.
 
As Dermot not been on yet bemoaning our penalty?
No doubt he'll give it a good going over
 
United have one more ‘injury’ than Liverpool - Ronaldo, to make 9.
There’s also Greenwood ‘injured’.

Are Sky following up with how ETH is performing miracles by doing even better than the best goalie, best defence, best midfielders, best attackers, best coach and most knowledgeable fans, with their only 8 injuries?
According to Transfermarkt, Liverpool still have a few more fit first team players than Man City.

Curious :/
 
I am "brave" enough not to give in totem tation, and join in with the indian puns.

I have too many reservations.
 
Fuckinell, read his rants.

All that cos his fucking Team lost to Forest!

He's listed a shitload of things that apparently the Dippers have been doing for ages and asks "why now"

Yet the chant "always the victims" has been going for about 10 years.
Started by the Rags I think and 1 year was subject to a lot of media spotlight before the game and then afterwards when the Rags were locked in for about an hour and sang the song and was recorded and played on TV news reports.
So it is reasonable to ask this bellend "why now"

( I know the answer, his teams "glory years" (1 title) are coming to an end there is fuck all he or the Cult can do about it because their owners are only in it for the £)
I thought it was started by chelsea ?
 
. . . . . . . . .

( I know the answer, his teams "glory years" (1 title) are coming to an end there is fuck all he or the Cult can do about it because their owners are only in it for the £)
I can't for the life of me understand why this is pluralised. 'Glory year' is more appropriate.
 
You are attempting to trivialise a term that is clearly intended as derogatory based on their lifestyle choice and sexual preference.It can only be described as homophobic when the term for someone who takes it up the arse is used as a direct insult and an attempt to belittle.

Its banter,but i can also accept that the gay community will find it very demeaning and hurtful.
Doing a Posh
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top