Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
It’s bullshit, UAE death penalty isn’t even used regularly.According to the BTL comments in the Grauniad, AbuDhabi executes gay men on a regular basis. They can’t name any actual cases tho’.
It’s bullshit, UAE death penalty isn’t even used regularly.According to the BTL comments in the Grauniad, AbuDhabi executes gay men on a regular basis. They can’t name any actual cases tho’.
Look at them lot up the road (amount they spent) and tell me that money alone is the main reason a club is successful. Brain-dead pundit whether I could ever call him that (ball and bat of the highest order)Jamie Carragher Is Sick Of Manchester City's Nonsense Argument About Their Spending | Balls.ie
Jamie Carragher is fed up by Manchester City's claims that their money has not been the defining aspect of their success in recent times.www.balls.ie
This clown obviously doesn't understand how FFP works. He should read Martin Samuel's brilliant article and then he might have more of a clue.I've summarised this in Carragher speak for anyone who can't be arsed to read such shit.
City are cheats, they really are and liverpool have never spent any money they really haven't and city winning 4 in 5 is *spits (at someone?)* ridiculous, it really is and liverpool's organic growth has proved their the best club in the world, they really are, it really is, they really are, it really is.
I know this was days ago but this is just talkSport for you. The debate was refuting Martin Samuels figures and comments from his article the other day(triggered them?):
The way it's clipped up, it looks like they are giving balance with White. Yet if you read the article(I don't listen listen to talkShite, seems to pop up on my recommended all the time though): https://talksport.com/football/1222979/manchester-city-liverpool-transfer-spend-simon-jordan-premier-league/
White is actually the one who came up with the £-440m figure basically saying Samuel doesn't know what he's talking about and is being selective(do they know he's a West Ham fan?). They were both at it claiming they'd ran the numbers.
Simon Jordan's "analysis" he later reveals was done LAST YEAR and it wasn't even a net spend comparison it was £'s per trophy. He's such a Liverpool/Klopp fanboy and a buffoon with it. How on earth was he a successful businessman?
White on the other hand, firstly missed that Martin Samuel said 5 years not 5 seasons. Samuel was also giving an average per year of £30m and comparing clubs based on that. Furthermore, White started his 5 season analysis at 2017-18. Most of the 5 year comparisons that come out around this time of the year(every other season), count the summer window as a new season. They update in Jan if there's any big movement. City aren't expected to buy anyone in Jan. Liverpool don't have any high profile players they want to sell in Jan either. Why would he start at 2017-18, who is it who's really changing the timeframe to suit their narrative? I think that would be you Mr White, if most people consider 2018-19 the starting point for the last 5 seasons.
Lastly, his figure was still wrong, he didn't include academy sales and even the figure he gave for the senior team in isolation wasn't correct. I've taken to using the euro version of the transfermrkt site, since finding out how they do currency conversion on the uk site. Maybe that's why I couldn't get the figure he did.
Oh and Jordan gave a full list of everything City fans did wrong on the day. Added some faux balance by saying Liverpool fans did stuff too but didn't reel off any list. You can tell he has it in for City fans by the double standards in his energy(loves a list, pointing and pausing between each one for effect). He's moaned about City fans before claiming no City fan would say the things he gets on twitter to his face. I've seen Liverpool fans dig him out worse because they somehow find a way to suggest even the lickspittles who defend them are biased against them. Lots of fans dig him out but it's City fans he chose in his example. He was likening himself to a HW boxer taking abuse from fans and pulling them up for it. Talking about accountability. Ironic because he lies about the ownership, CAS and City all the time.
I know this was days ago but this is just talkSport for you. The debate was refuting Martin Samuels figures and comments from his article the other day(triggered them?):
The way it's clipped up, it looks like they are giving balance with White. Yet if you read the article(I don't listen listen to talkShite, seems to pop up on my recommended all the time though): https://talksport.com/football/1222979/manchester-city-liverpool-transfer-spend-simon-jordan-premier-league/
White is actually the one who came up with the £-440m figure basically saying Samuel doesn't know what he's talking about and is being selective(do they know he's a West Ham fan?). They were both at it claiming they'd ran the numbers.
Simon Jordan's "analysis" he later reveals was done LAST YEAR and it wasn't even a net spend comparison it was £'s per trophy. He's such a Liverpool/Klopp fanboy and a buffoon with it. How on earth was he a successful businessman?
White on the other hand, firstly missed that Martin Samuel said 5 years not 5 seasons. Samuel was also giving an average per year of £30m and comparing clubs based on that. Furthermore, White started his 5 season analysis at 2017-18. Most of the 5 year comparisons that come out around this time of the year(every other season), count the summer window as a new season. They update in Jan if there's any big movement. City aren't expected to buy anyone in Jan. Liverpool don't have any high profile players they want to sell in Jan either. Why would he start at 2017-18, who is it who's really changing the timeframe to suit their narrative? I think that would be you Mr White, if most people consider 2018-19 the starting point for the last 5 seasons.
Lastly, his figure was still wrong, he didn't include academy sales and even the figure he gave for the senior team in isolation wasn't correct. I've taken to using the euro version of the transfermrkt site, since finding out how they do currency conversion on the uk site. Maybe that's why I couldn't get the figure he did.
Oh and Jordan gave a full list of everything City fans did wrong on the day. Added some faux balance by saying Liverpool fans did stuff too but didn't reel off any list. You can tell he has it in for City fans by the double standards in his energy(loves a list, pointing and pausing between each one for effect). He's moaned about City fans before claiming no City fan would say the things he gets on twitter to his face. I've seen Liverpool fans dig him out worse because they somehow find a way to suggest even the lickspittles who defend them are biased against them. Lots of fans dig him out but it's City fans he chose in his example. He was likening himself to a HW boxer taking abuse from fans and pulling them up for it. Talking about accountability. Ironic because he lies about the ownership, CAS and City all the time.
I remember Lescott saying they were a bunch of shithouses.Hope the next time these ‘so-called ‘anti-discrimination group’ cunts turn up at City with their hands out for cash we send them packing. Absolute cowards and shithouses
Jurgen Klopp: Football Association will not investigate Liverpool manager's comments
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/63351747