andyhinch
Well-Known Member
Get your 50 cal out mate, you know it makes sense.kin ell, I'm going back to work
Get your 50 cal out mate, you know it makes sense.kin ell, I'm going back to work
You’re ignoring the cost containment in HR1384 (Jayapal) and S1129. Personally I’d lower the standard directive found in JSP 398.HR 1384 is so last week, JR 3956 is where it’s at.
And they claim cricket and roundabouts are hard to understand. American politics is so weird.Can we have US opinion sub forum as the next sub forum so I can ignore half the shite spouted form over the pond.
;-)
And yes medicare for all is doable so why not do it?
You’re ignoring the cost containment in HR1384 (Jayapal) and S1129. Personally I’d lower the standard directive found in JSP 398.
In all seriousness, Rogan interviews Sanders.
Note how Sanders dismisses your point on Medicare, @Dax777.
I've finished work early today, so will start to absorb info I've missed on the bills we've talked about.
In all seriousness, Rogan interviews Sanders.
Note how Sanders dismisses your point on Medicare, @Dax777.
I've finished work early today, so will start to absorb info I've missed on the bills we've talked about.
What point of mine did he dismiss?
There is nothing tedious about knowing why things may or may not work. Wishing things into existence like you like doing, is the stuff of childish petulance
Dude, we don't have "Medicare for All". We have a type of coverage for 65 and older. It covers certain things and not others. Private insurance is allowed as an addition. Some MFA proposals ban private insurance. So, no. We don't have the system. Not even close.