The rest I agree. Sounds more like the sensible Pudge :)[/quote]Dax777 said:pudge said:Do you mean advocating signing Aaron Lennon or Ashley Young or Josh McEachran or Niko Kranjcar or Charlie Adam to back up Silva or maybe you're referring to that dazzling eye for young talent that led him to believe a 20 year old Gareth Bale wasn't worth the hype and would fizzle out
Awwwh what? Come on Pudge! if you are going to dredge up history, it'd be great if you do it with a modicum of honesty and present the claims in its true context.
I did not 'advocate' signing Lennon or Young - I simply said at the time that they were a couple of the only gettable English players I'd consider because they had something we lacked at the time "pure speed!" I.e. My point being that we consider at the time English players who played a continental style such as, yes Wilshere and Mceachran or players with blazing speed such as Lennon or Young. And yes I'd definitely had taken Lennon as a replacement for SWP. Again increasing speed on the wings was the context, and English players I'd consider for it.
As for Adams and Kranjar ( even though I don't remember advocating for either) both were technical players with a pass on them, Silva sometimes got injured (I can see how I could have Advocated acquiring them as backups.) The real question is this, who were City's creative backups at the time? But I'd like to see the quotes in its true context.
And as for Bale, come on dude, If you search my comments on Bale, there close to 90 of them - 95% of those constitutes me pinning for Bale in every way I could, yet you quote the one time I comment on his "Hype". A comment I prefaced by saying "I don't know why, and have no basis for feeling this way" (I.e what I see suggests otherwise) "but I Think the Bale hype would fizzle out." You conveniently ignore the preface, ignore 95% of comments that stated the absolute support for acquiring Bale time and time again, but conveniently cherry pick a quote, about the "hype" around Bale, and state it as my position. That is just low. Pure and simple.
Sorry man, but that's cheap.
Glad we dodged that bullet.
Again, No! I wanted Cabaye, City was interested in Fernando, sure he is a good shout, but not my choice. But I'm sure you knew that but chose to conveniently ignore it. Probably conveniently ignored my being unpleased with paying starter money for a backup ( I.e what I considered Fernando).Or even perhaps it was wanting to sign Fernando a year earlier, or the walking calamity that is Vertonghen or the can't defend to save his life David Luiz.
As for David Luiz? Absolutely! Hands upI wanted him here, when he was at Benfica, watched him at Chelsea, ignored the English media narrative, and concluded he'd be a stud here. My opinion hasn't changed on that. PSG paid 50 million for him to come start for them. And he has been solid. So yeah, on Luiz you got me. And while many here don't respect his game, his performances disagrees with them.
As for Vertonghen, wasn't he Prem first 11 the season after I cried we should get him? Wait let me see who we had in that period: Toure, Lescott, Savic, Boyata... Sure I am the idiot for wanting a perm 11 player over those backups.
Every young player, and transfer in general, is a gamble to an extent; some pan out, some don't fair enough. So it's not as easy to say "sign x, y and z and we're set for the next 10 years" is it? So perhaps it is better to allow for a little more time.
Dax clearly watches the Eredivisie and knows about Depay that's fine, I'm not arguing that. It's the previous posters advocating for 5 players from 5 different teams playing Football Manager that's the thing.
I take it I can tell my secretary to cancel our meeting? Or better yet just get shot of her so long as you're stalking my posts.
I admit reading that back it comes across as cheap shot after cheap shot, however, I can say my intention was to bring it full circle to that last point; it's not as easy as just saying sign so and so.
The majority of those were from memory so again I admit the context may be incorrect (however I remember the Adam one well) but again it's the idea of numerous names getting floated around with little substance.
You clearly are universal in your watching of football and your opinion on most will be an informed opinion but like I said at the end, it's when new lineups for next season have 6/7 new players crop up after a back page article on a player and all of a sudden poster clamour for x, y and z when they never even whispered their name prior to a tweet.
By all means, those who have seen Depay etc I would love to hear about his attributes both positive and negative. From the little I've seen of him he seems quite direct (something we lack) but perhaps takes on a bit too much in trying to do it all. Obviously has an eye for goal but is he helped by being one of if not PSV's main guy and how would that translate going to a club like us as opposed to say Spurs where he would certainly be a mainstay in the team.
There's a difference in saying and asking that to me saying "Sign him and these other blokes we're linked with and we're sorted"
I don't want to sound like I'm picking on him but posters were salivating at our defensive prowess last summer when we were signing Fernando and Mangala and they've not exactly done much to merit that. Probably because many just got caught up in signing a player and watching youtube videos.
EDIT: the quoting's been messed up, apologies.