Bigga said:
Right. A man touches a young person below age. One is not proved, the other is as he married her.
What's the difference and why is it more or less acceptable, either way??
Shocking that you can see a difference, really and I'm changing my views on some people...
Oh get over yourself you self righteous twat. If you can't see a difference then you really are stupid.
I'm not saying what Elvis did was right but are there any other stories of Elvis going with young girls ? Not that I'm aware, I deduce from this that although he did indeed fall for someone who was under age, it was Priscilla the person and not Priscilla the 14 year old girl that attracted him.
Compare that with Jackson, you will find that in his case it's young boy after young boy that he befriended. Once they are old enough he wasn't interested. Elvis married Priscilla.
Lets take your argument further. You seem to like going by the letter of the law. An 18 year old lad who sleeps with his 15 year old girlfriend would be just as guilty in your eyes if he had raped a baby.
Both are classed as rape and in your eyes both are the same.
Wake up.