Bigga
Well-Known Member
stony said:
Can't be arsed re-reading something that had no defence to it...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Michael Jackson R.I.P [merged]
- Thread starter HelloCity
- Start date
Can't be arsed re-reading something that had no defence to it...
ElanJo said:This is where it really began:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-blEgMyJwU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-blEgMyJwU</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=4-mqVVj0PyU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=e ... -mqVVj0PyU</a>
Bigga
Well-Known Member
TheMightyQuinn said:My 24 year old mate went with a 15yr old recently, unknowingly.
Well, that's all in the knowing and unknowing, isn't it?
The real question would be if your friend would have continued if he KNEW...
Bigga said:YOU would be as keen if it was YOUR daughter pursued!!
Nice dodge, fookwit!
Here's your answer, I have a daughter she is 25. If a 20 year old bloke was messing around with her when she was 14, he would have got a serious fucking kicking.
I also have a son, he is 16. If a middle aged man interfered with him when he was 10, I would kill him, without a shadow of a fucking doubt.
dannybcity
Well-Known Member
Bigga said:dannybcity said:Bigga said:Are you saying that because I stole sweet when i was 7 and Brady murdered kids, we are the same?
So, in effect, you agree with me that there's NO difference in sexual abuse regarding the 'Lolita Effect' and alleged 'abuse' within a Jackson-type situation?!!
At last, we got there!!
ARGH, what he's saying is that despite their being no legal difference between a 16 year old lad sleeping with his 15 year old girlfriend and much more serious case, there is socially. This is true.
NOBODY is comparing 16 and 15. Nobody, except for flawed arguers!
We are talking about GROWN FOLK, over the age of 20(Elvis was 23, I believe and IN THE ARMY!). Wyman was in his 40's!!
Don't make stupid comparisons, people!!
OK so only you are allowed to slide in and out of hypotheotical situations. I understand. Will you feel better if we all say how great he was, maybe we could all get together and do a cover of candle in the wind? Who knows, good night off topic.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
stony said:Bigga said:YOU would be as keen if it was YOUR daughter pursued!!
Nice dodge, fookwit!
Here's your answer, I have a daughter she is 25. If a 20 year old bloke was messing around with her when she was 14, he would have got a serious fucking kicking.
I also have a son, he is 16. If a middle aged man interfered with him when he was 10, I would kill him, without a shadow of a fucking doubt.
So explain why you think there's a difference in what I was trying to say, then!!
TheMightyQuinn
Well-Known Member
Bigga said:TheMightyQuinn said:My 24 year old mate went with a 15yr old recently, unknowingly.
Well, that's all in the knowing and unknowing, isn't it?
The real question would be if your friend would have continued if he KNEW...
He probably would but I don't know for sure, he's a pussy hound ultimately.
I get the argument but you must get mine?
johnny on the spot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jul 2006
- Messages
- 24,748
Just what the fucking hell is Uri Gellar going on about?
Bigga said:stony said:Bigga said:YOU would be as keen if it was YOUR daughter pursued!!
Nice dodge, fookwit!
Here's your answer, I have a daughter she is 25. If a 20 year old bloke was messing around with her when she was 14, he would have got a serious fucking kicking.
I also have a son, he is 16. If a middle aged man interfered with him when he was 10, I would kill him, without a shadow of a fucking doubt.
So explain why you think there's a difference in what I was trying to say, then!!
I thought your point was there isn't a difference in the two ? I think there is.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
dannybcity said:Bigga said:dannybcity said:Bigga said:Are you saying that because I stole sweet when i was 7 and Brady murdered kids, we are the same?
So, in effect, you agree with me that there's NO difference in sexual abuse regarding the 'Lolita Effect' and alleged 'abuse' within a Jackson-type situation?!!
At last, we got there!!
ARGH, what he's saying is that despite their being no legal difference between a 16 year old lad sleeping with his 15 year old girlfriend and much more serious case, there is socially. This is true.
NOBODY is comparing 16 and 15. Nobody, except for flawed arguers!
We are talking about GROWN FOLK, over the age of 20(Elvis was 23, I believe and IN THE ARMY!). Wyman was in his 40's!!
Don't make stupid comparisons, people!!
OK so only you are allowed to slide in and out of hypotheotical situations. I understand. Will you feel better if we all say how great he was, maybe we could all get together and do a cover of candle in the wind? Who knows, good night off topic.
The LAW would ignore 'acceptable age gaps' as has been done before. It is RARE that kids with an age gap of 1-2 years ever reach trial.
When you're an ADULT, it's called 'influence' and therefore you can be charged!