A
A
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Michael Jackson R.I.P [merged]
- Thread starter HelloCity
- Start date
Darker shade of Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2009
- Messages
- 2,041
der-bomber said:Darker shade of Blue said:I was half hoping he might buy Everton :o(
You like it on here don't ya ...?
Nah ,
I'm just sympathetic to the fact that if I left , the forum would implode due to lack of good discussion :P
Bigga
Well-Known Member
stony said:Bigga said:Still, it's nice to know there's a HUGE fooking hole in your 'difference' argument, which you cannot even BEGIN to explain!!
I already explained the difference, just because you disagree with it doesn't make it less valid.
Like I said, the ridiculous notion that MARRIAGE sanctifies 'statutory rape'!! Oh, and you dodged my question whether YOU would be as keen if it was YOUR daughter pursued!!
Nice dodge, fookwit!
Gogootz
Well-Known Member
I love MJ and rate him as a performer and musician thirdly only to James Brown and to Prince. I had tickets to see him next year, and I'm gutted I'll never get to see him now.
RIP Blue.
RIP Blue.
TheMightyQuinn
Well-Known Member
Bigga said:TheMightyQuinn said:Bigga said:Here's me thinking the Law was all we had to live by...
Viva La Revolution!!
The law? I have little respect for it and break it if it suits me albeit in minor ways. There's always a grey area and whilst my drug use, downloading, whatever is hardly on a par with the crimes of Ian Brady it still renders us both 'criminal'.
So, wait a minute...
Are you saying that because I stole sweet when i was 7 and Brady murdered kids, we are the same?
So, in effect, you agree with me that there's NO difference in sexual abuse regarding the 'Lolita Effect' and alleged 'abuse' within a Jackson-type situation?!!
At last, we got there!!
If you're happy being tagged along with Gary Glitter, Ian Brady, Dahmer etc then yeah we've reached a mutual agreement.
dannybcity
Well-Known Member
Bigga said:Are you saying that because I stole sweet when i was 7 and Brady murdered kids, we are the same?
So, in effect, you agree with me that there's NO difference in sexual abuse regarding the 'Lolita Effect' and alleged 'abuse' within a Jackson-type situation?!!
At last, we got there!!
ARGH, what he's saying is that despite their being no legal difference between a 16 year old lad sleeping with his 15 year old girlfriend and much more serious case, there is socially. This is true.
*EDIT* whether this can be applied to the Elvis example is a matter of personal judgement I suppose.
Bigga said:stony said:Bigga said:Still, it's nice to know there's a HUGE fooking hole in your 'difference' argument, which you cannot even BEGIN to explain!!
I already explained the difference, just because you disagree with it doesn't make it less valid.
Like I said, the ridiculous notion that MARRIAGE sanctifies 'statutory rape'!! Oh, and you dodged my question whether YOU would be as keen if it was YOUR daughter pursued!!
Nice dodge, fookwit!
Ahh the typical standard Bigga response 'an insult' re read the thread you fucking moron (see anyone can do it)
ElanJo
Well-Known Member
This is where it really began:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-blEgMyJwU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-blEgMyJwU</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-blEgMyJwU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-blEgMyJwU</a>
Bigga
Well-Known Member
dannybcity said:Bigga said:Are you saying that because I stole sweet when i was 7 and Brady murdered kids, we are the same?
So, in effect, you agree with me that there's NO difference in sexual abuse regarding the 'Lolita Effect' and alleged 'abuse' within a Jackson-type situation?!!
At last, we got there!!
ARGH, what he's saying is that despite their being no legal difference between a 16 year old lad sleeping with his 15 year old girlfriend and much more serious case, there is socially. This is true.
NOBODY is comparing 16 and 15. Nobody, except for flawed arguers!
We are talking about GROWN FOLK, over the age of 20(Elvis was 23, I believe and IN THE ARMY!). Wyman was in his 40's!!
Don't make stupid comparisons, people!!
TheMightyQuinn
Well-Known Member
Bigga said:dannybcity said:Bigga said:Are you saying that because I stole sweet when i was 7 and Brady murdered kids, we are the same?
So, in effect, you agree with me that there's NO difference in sexual abuse regarding the 'Lolita Effect' and alleged 'abuse' within a Jackson-type situation?!!
At last, we got there!!
ARGH, what he's saying is that despite their being no legal difference between a 16 year old lad sleeping with his 15 year old girlfriend and much more serious case, there is socially. This is true.
NOBODY is comparing 16 and 15. Nobody, except for flawed arguers!
We are talking about GROWN FOLK, over the age of 20(Elvis was 23, I believe and IN THE ARMY!). Wyman was in his 40's!!
Don't make stupid comparisons, people!!
My 24 year old mate went with a 15yr old recently, unknowingly.