GX Blue
Well-Known Member
What a dreadful post.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Michael Jackson
What a dreadful post.
“The FBI secretly investigate Michael Jackson for four years - tracking his where abouts, his computers, phone calls, etc and release a 300 plus page file completely vindicating him, stating there was absolutely nothing to even remotely suggest he was an abuser, and the general public (and media) completely ignores it. Yet two admitted liars and perjurers (one of which who even refers to himself as a ‘master of deception’) can come out with a completely one sided, sensationalist story (yes story not documentary) which contains literally no evidence whatsoever (and is full of inconsistencies) and a large majority of the public doesn’t even question it.
The jurors who found Michael Jackson not guilty in his 2005 trial agree with the FBI. Juror Paulina Coccoz said: ‘It was pretty obvious there was no molestation done...it was pretty obvious that there were ulterior motives on behalf of the family. And the mother, she orchestrated the whole thing..there wasn’t a shred of evidence’.
Just because a story is graphic and disturbing doesn’t make it factual. Before you judge anything do your research. Facts don’t lie, people do.
The bottom line is..If you want to view Michael Jackson as a pedophile, you will. It’s easy to do. He admitted to allowing children to sleep in his bedroom (which itself is the same size as a small two story house) and has been accused of child molestation more then once. He’s not the guy next door, was undeniably eccentric, and most certainly didn’t live a conventional life.
But to anyone who has bothered to look into the allegations against him - and I mean really look into them - there is more than enough evidence to demonstrate that he was a victim of extortion and of copycat false claims for the past twenty five years. Yet despite the Los Angeles Police Department stating that Jackson should be presumed to be innocent, despite a jury finding him not guilty on every single charge against him, despite the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services twice investigating and clearing him of wrongdoing, despite the FBI conducting a very thorough investigation in which no evidence of wrongdoing was found, and despite the cash grab lawsuits of his posthumous accusers being tossed out of court, the court of public opinion may sadly be what defines this saga and a large part of his legacy.”
The jurors who found Michael Jackson not guilty in his 2005 trial agree with the FBI. Juror Paulina Coccoz said: ‘It was pretty obvious there was no molestation done...it was pretty obvious that there were ulterior motives on behalf of the family. And the mother, she orchestrated the whole thing..there wasn’t a shred of evidence’.
Just because a story is graphic and disturbing doesn’t make it factual. Before you judge anything do your research. Facts don’t lie, people do.
The bottom line is..If you want to view Michael Jackson as a pedophile, you will. It’s easy to do. He admitted to allowing children to sleep in his bedroom (which itself is the same size as a small two story house) and has been accused of child molestation more then once. He’s not the guy next door, was undeniably eccentric, and most certainly didn’t live a conventional life.
But to anyone who has bothered to look into the allegations against him - and I mean really look into them - there is more than enough evidence to demonstrate that he was a victim of extortion and of copycat false claims for the past twenty five years. Yet despite the Los Angeles Police Department stating that Jackson should be presumed to be innocent, despite a jury finding him not guilty on every single charge against him, despite the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services twice investigating and clearing him of wrongdoing, despite the FBI conducting a very thorough investigation in which no evidence of wrongdoing was found, and despite the cash grab lawsuits of his posthumous accusers being tossed out of court, the court of public opinion may sadly be what defines this saga and a large part of his legacy.”
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Why? i followed it from and including the trial,just because someone accuses someone of something it doesn't make it true,we can make our own minds up and that's my opinion,you can say anything you like 10yrs after the person has died,they have no right to replyWhat a dreadful post.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
I'll add to that,Jay Leno testified that one of the families tried to get close to him and get money from him,they were shown to be scammers and discredited,like you say the facts are there if you want to look“The FBI secretly investigate Michael Jackson for four years - tracking his where abouts, his computers, phone calls, etc and release a 300 plus page file completely vindicating him, stating there was absolutely nothing to even remotely suggest he was an abuser, and the general public (and media) completely ignores it. Yet two admitted liars and perjurers (one of which who even refers to himself as a ‘master of deception’) can come out with a completely one sided, sensationalist story (yes story not documentary) which contains literally no evidence whatsoever (and is full of inconsistencies) and a large majority of the public doesn’t even question it.
The jurors who found Michael Jackson not guilty in his 2005 trial agree with the FBI. Juror Paulina Coccoz said: ‘It was pretty obvious there was no molestation done...it was pretty obvious that there were ulterior motives on behalf of the family. And the mother, she orchestrated the whole thing..there wasn’t a shred of evidence’.
Just because a story is graphic and disturbing doesn’t make it factual. Before you judge anything do your research. Facts don’t lie, people do.
The bottom line is..If you want to view Michael Jackson as a pedophile, you will. It’s easy to do. He admitted to allowing children to sleep in his bedroom (which itself is the same size as a small two story house) and has been accused of child molestation more then once. He’s not the guy next door, was undeniably eccentric, and most certainly didn’t live a conventional life.
But to anyone who has bothered to look into the allegations against him - and I mean really look into them - there is more than enough evidence to demonstrate that he was a victim of extortion and of copycat false claims for the past twenty five years. Yet despite the Los Angeles Police Department stating that Jackson should be presumed to be innocent, despite a jury finding him not guilty on every single charge against him, despite the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services twice investigating and clearing him of wrongdoing, despite the FBI conducting a very thorough investigation in which no evidence of wrongdoing was found, and despite the cash grab lawsuits of his posthumous accusers being tossed out of court, the court of public opinion may sadly be what defines this saga and a large part of his legacy.”
Banned Tosspot
Well-Known Member
Mr Partridge
Well-Known Member
I really can't understand this logic that because he paid off his accusers back in 93, that proves he's guilty. To me it proves the exact opposite. The fact that that family were so willing to accept the money speaks volumes and completely discredits them in my view. So many people in the world are completely driven by money and money alone.
Another thing, in the 2003 Martin Bashir documentary, he sat there with that young lad and openly admitted to the whole world that they shared a bedroom, would he really have done that if he was this dirty old paedo that people think he is? Why spend years trying to cover up abuse to then blurt out to the world a revelation like that? Any normal person would know how that would have been perceived, but Michael was stupid and naive, and that proved it, and if it was true he would have had to have been the cleverest fucker on earth to cover it up for all them years. He was the most famous man in the world for God's sake.
Another thing, in the 2003 Martin Bashir documentary, he sat there with that young lad and openly admitted to the whole world that they shared a bedroom, would he really have done that if he was this dirty old paedo that people think he is? Why spend years trying to cover up abuse to then blurt out to the world a revelation like that? Any normal person would know how that would have been perceived, but Michael was stupid and naive, and that proved it, and if it was true he would have had to have been the cleverest fucker on earth to cover it up for all them years. He was the most famous man in the world for God's sake.
I can't see Fred The Weatherman getting such support from thousands of people if he said that he got in bed with young boys because he was just a child at heart.
Fred's a shit dancer though.
I preferred MJ's version of Man in the Mirror to Fred's.
Tuearts right boot
Well-Known Member
Well if it flies like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck....
Fame Monster
Well-Known Member
Didn't Jordan Chandler (?) claim something distinctive about Michael Jackson's cock that turned out to be anatomically correct?
Maybe Jacko just had a micropenis and that's why he paid him the hush money.
Maybe Jacko just had a micropenis and that's why he paid him the hush money.
Nebuchadnezzar
Well-Known Member
The ‘keepsake’ of rings should of triggered alarm bells to the producers, I’d love to know who the researcher was as any psychology for dummies book would highlight more holes than Augusta!!!
Please forgive my ignorance but i'm curious to understand the psychological side of that bit with the rings?