I wouldn't say it was fine, that was him basically saying what you have done is wrong, however, sort me a few quid out and we'll pretend it never happened. Says all he need to know about his views on justice etc.
Also says a fair amount on Jackson’s views of justice. That it can be paid off. But you don’t seem to have any issue with the above mentioned nonce from your comments so far in the thread.
 
Also says a fair amount on Jackson’s views of justice. That it can be paid off. But you don’t seem to have any issue with the above mentioned nonce from your comments so far in the thread.

What he's accused of doing is appalling, Im sure if it was as cut and dry as some think then he would have spent years behind bars. Maybe also if the alleged victims would have removed the pound signs from their eyes then Jacko could have faced justice (if guilty).

Why wait until he is dead to speak out? What can be gained by it?
 
What he's accused of doing is appalling, Im sure if it was as cut and dry as some think then he would have spent years behind bars. Maybe also if the alleged victims would have removed the pound signs from their eyes then Jacko could have faced justice (if guilty).

Why wait until he is dead to speak out? What can be gained by it?
That’s the thing, lots didn’t wait hence him paying out $35m to silence alleged victims whilst he was alive.
 
On which note: https://entertainment.theonion.com/...e-questions-why-accusers-only-comi-1833105791

SANTA BARBARA, CA—Noting that the timing of the allegations appeared to be “a little too perfect,” a lawyer representing Michael Jackson’s estate questioned Wednesday why those accusing the late pop icon of child sexual abuse had only come forward steadily since the early 1990s. “It seems awfully convenient that all these people suddenly decided to come out of the woodwork on a regular basis over the course of a quarter century,” said Jonathan Steinsapir, explaining that he also found it quite suspicious that some had chosen to make their accusations as grown men instead of doing so back in the ’90s like so many other children did. “This all seems like quite the coincidence to me. Are we to believe that one man with access to a private Peter Pan–themed ranch, a multimillion-dollar legal team, and a rabid fanbase willing to ignore his considerable eccentricities could just molest a bunch of kids without us finding out about more than a handful of them per year since 1992? That’s a bit far-fetched.” Steinsapir added that suspecting a grown man of sexual misconduct simply because he made a habit of inviting underage fans to sleepovers in which they shared his bed was unfair and “frankly just cynical.”

And yes it's satire.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.