I thought they were done Automatically? If not, fair play on cleaning it up.
Yeah. That’s the issue. Not the pedo that abused children for twenty odd years. It’s the OP for using ‘nonce’ in the tags.

Now where are those fanny wipes?
 
Yeah. That’s the issue. Not the pedo that abused children for twenty odd years. It’s the OP for using ‘nonce’ in the tags.

Now where are those fanny wipes?


Maybe use another word less evocative like kiddie fiddler or uncle fester next time


I thought they were done Automatically? If not, fair play on cleaning it up.


No you tag your own posts but can be removed by mods/ric
 
Last edited:
Maybe use another word less evocative like kiddie fiddler or uncle fester next time
Reminds me of Brass Eye.

"You're a slot badger. You're a 2-pin din plug. You're a bush dodger. You're a small bean regarder. You're an unabummer. You're a nut administrator. You're a bent ref. You're the crazy world of Arthur Brown. You're a fence vole. You're a free willy. You're a chimney bottler. You're a bunty man. You're a shrub rocketeer."
 
Yeah. That’s the issue. Not the pedo that abused children for twenty odd years. It’s the OP for using ‘nonce’ in the tags.

Now where are those fanny wipes?
I honestly thought they were generated through an algorithm of used words on the thread.

To be fair I agree with you in this thread. The wacko jack off fans are as bad as scousers for denial.
 
Reminds me of Brass Eye.

"You're a slot badger. You're a 2-pin din plug. You're a bush dodger. You're a small bean regarder. You're an unabummer. You're a nut administrator. You're a bent ref. You're the crazy world of Arthur Brown. You're a fence vole. You're a free willy. You're a chimney bottler. You're a bunty man. You're a shrub rocketeer."

It's just another form of racism.
 
Finished watching this last night.

I am often astonished on BM by some of the things I read from other posters.

That any person with more than 2 brain cells to rub together can genuinely believe that Jackson wasn’t a pedo is beyond my comprehension.

It really couldn’t be any clearer.

There are some very very worrying people on here imo.
 
Same year. He had lupus.

MJ-D-michael-jackson-20930758-778-1200.jpg

How old was lupus at the time?
 
There were quite a few.

I remember his trial, with that young kid (Jordie???), when Jackson was found not guilty. The foreman of the jury was interviewed outside the court, and said " there is no doubt that Jackson abused him, we just couldn't prove it".
I always found it strange, that the Jackson estate never "went to town" on this quote.
I always "found it strange " that the parents of the kids let them, leave home..,stay at never never land.....and let THEIR CHILDREN stay.with a stranger...overnight...lol....no alarm bells ringing cos;
1.we trust michael,for he is a millionaire superstar;
2. We just banked our 'expenses' cheque ...
 
Finished watching this last night.

I am often astonished on BM by some of the things I read from other posters.

That any person with more than 2 brain cells to rub together can genuinely believe that Jackson wasn’t a pedo is beyond my comprehension.

It really couldn’t be any clearer.

There are some very very worrying people on here imo.
Some proper wrong uns about.
 
It might have been a good idea for the alleged victims to not chase the money, not swear under oath that nothing happened but instead give him a chance to defend himself in a court of law and if found guilty then face his punishment.

Let's just say for argument's sake that the alleged victims are telling the truth. They don't owe the guy anything. If I knew 100% what he did and was dealing with it in my own way, giving the guy a chance to defend himself wouldn't be especially high on my list of priorities. It isn't that much of stretch to understand why someone might not want to admit they were a victim of child abuse and I can also understand why they wouldn't want to have to face that person while they were still alive.
 
Let's just say for argument's sake that the alleged victims are telling the truth. They don't owe the guy anything. If I knew 100% what he did and was dealing with it in my own way, giving the guy a chance to defend himself wouldn't be especially high on my list of priorities. It isn't that much of stretch to understand why someone might not want to admit they were a victim of child abuse and I can also understand why they wouldn't want to have to face that person while they were still alive.

He was a pedo??? His demina covered up a lot of what he got away with!!! Fuck him feel for the victims
 
He was a pedo??? His demina covered up a lot of what he got away with!!! Fuck him feel for the victims

I do feel for the victims. I believe them. My point is that people shouldn't necessarily think they're lying now just because they denied it in the past. I was addressing someone who said they were unsure of whether to believe them.
 
I recently revisited the Jackson - Jarvis Cocker incident on Youtube, and it Jarvis's account gives quite a good idea of the sort of bullying tactics that his legal team used. They were basically desperate to try and get him done for any crime at all, even lying about him assaulting a child on stage at one point (even though it was all recorded), all for the terrible crime of protesting his performance. And that was against one of the biggest pop stars in the country at the time. Imagine how they acted when it was some nobody and their kid accusing him of something that would see him go to jail for years.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top