Michael le Vell (Kevin Webster)

[CTID1988]

Still no news on Webster?? Can't find anything online but he did arrive at court to here the outcome

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/live-coronation-street-actor-michael-5874278" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... el-5874278</a>

Jurys out at the moment i think

 

[kenzie115]

Also, the child isnt a child anymore right? Well, they are 17. So would lie with ease

Age doesn't determine whether someone can lie or not. Our Sandra(cousin) could lie like a rug from being a toddler. She had more bare faced cheek than Dizzy Gillespie. My son on the other hand can't lie to save his life. He's nearly 21 now, and everytime he tells a porky it's written all over his face.

Agree, my brother's 18 and has to be honest all the time because he's useless at lying whereas my 11 year old sister could lie for England.

 

[sergiokun]

Still no news on Webster?? Can't find anything online but he did arrive at court to here the outcome

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/live-coronation-street-actor-michael-5874278" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... el-5874278</a>

Jurys out at the moment i think

cheers pal

 

[Daz_Blue]

I feel sorry for Rosie ........ everyone in the rovers will be looking at her now

 

[CTID1988]

Whats everyone going for then?

I reckon the jury will go for Not guilty<br /><br />-- Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:01 pm --<br /><br />

I feel sorry for Rosie ........ everyone in the rovers will be looking at her now

Too right they will !

 

[banjo]

I think the jury will return with a verdict of not guilty....

 

[tidyman]

Whats everyone going for then?

I reckon the jury will go for Not guilty.

Don't know what's taking them.

A quick glance on here after day one of the trial and they'd have known the verdict should be, not guilty but with a, there's no smoke without fire, saver.

 

[warpig]

I think the jury will return with a verdict of not guilty....

i was of this opinion as well until i read the judges legal direciton to the jury. think this could go either way.

 

[sergiokun]

The jury have been sent out for lunch in the Michael Le Vell trial. They will continue to deliberate their verdicts at 2.15pm.

 

[WEMBLEY76]

I guess it will be not guilty.

 

[Phil Meup]

I guess it will be not guilty.

I think it will too, even though i think he's done it.
Not guilty will just mean there's some doubt - not that he's innocent.
Its a sad case all round.

 

[squirtyflower]

I guess it will be not guilty.

I think it will too, even though i think he's done it.
Not guilty will just mean there's some doubt - not that he's innocent.
Its a sad case all round.

Not guilty means not guilty

 

[NipHolmes]

I guess it will be not guilty.

I think it will too, even though i think he's done it.
Not guilty will just mean there's some doubt - not that he's innocent.
Its a sad case all round.

In your mind yes, in the eyes of the law he didn't commit the crime and is free to live his life.

What you are on about is interpretation and belief. If you think he did it then that's up to you. All I will say is that the jury are enlightened with more details than any of us and we should respect their judgement.

John Leslie strikes me as a guilty man walking free. However the point is that means fuck all unless it's turned into a criminal proceedings.

 

[tidyman]

I highly doubt the verdict will alter many people's opinion of his guilt or otherwise on here.

There will be at least 20 pages of either, he might be not guilty but that's just cos they couldn't prove it.

Or,

I still don't think he did it. They've only found him guilty cos of the word of the girl.

To be fair, I know of several posters who have followed the case very closely in The Star every morning. So I'm sure there's nothing that's been said in court over the last two weeks that they're not familiar with.

 

[Blue Til Death]

I guess it will be not guilty.

I think it will too, even though i think he's done it.
Not guilty will just mean there's some doubt - not that he's innocent.
Its a sad case all round.

Lets just hope you never do jury service and apply the same stupid, groundless logic.. What you are refering to I suspect is the Scottish verdict, not proven, which means not enough evidence to convict but not a not guilty verdict...

 

[stony]

I know one thing, I wouldn't want to be sat on the jury for something like this.

 

[peoffrey]

I guess it will be not guilty.

I think it will too, even though i think he's done it.
Not guilty will just mean there's some doubt - not that he's innocent.
Its a sad case all round.

Not guilty means not guilty

It arguably doesn't. It just means they can't prove he did it.

 

[Blue Til Death]

I think it will too, even though i think he's done it.
Not guilty will just mean there's some doubt - not that he's innocent.
Its a sad case all round.

Not guilty means not guilty

It arguably doesn't. It just means they can't prove he did it.

So therefore..................... Not guilty means not guilty

 

[pominoz]

Not guilty means not guilty

It arguably doesn't. It just means they can't prove he did it.

So therefore..................... Not guilty means not guilty

No, it does not.

 

[squirtyflower]

I think it will too, even though i think he's done it.
Not guilty will just mean there's some doubt - not that he's innocent.
Its a sad case all round.

Not guilty means not guilty

It arguably doesn't. It just means they can't prove he did it.

I'm aware of that too, however it seems to mock the 'freedoms' that some people on here cry out loud about that they trample underfoot when it doesn't suit