Middle East Conflict

Here's a follow-up to the original Greyzone article that's caused the fuss.


Incidentally The Socialist Worker claims it was served with a D-Notice at the end of October to do with British special forces deploying to Israel.



The information acquired by both YNET and Haaretz have been direct accounts and enquiries of the frontline IDFs opinions and disclosures of the melee and scattergun approaches that they had to engage.

Their accounts of having to strike first (thus first strike) was as their comments the lack of orders and what to conduct. Given that they are unable to discern who/where are their enemies and who are their own, it makes sense, however unfortunate to the escapees, that they were expected to attack first shoot on sight rather than for example be surprised too late by an RPG. The scene was surreal and chaotic.

In an interview with Israel’s Mako news outlet, one Apache pilot reflected on the tortuous dilemma of whether to shoot at people and cars returning to Gaza. He knew that many of those vehicles may have contained Israeli captives. But he chose to open fire anyway. “I choose targets like that,” the pilot reflected, “where I tell myself that the chance that I am shooting here on hostages as well is low.” However, he admitted that his judgment “was not 100%.”

“I understand that we have to shoot here and quickly,” the commander of the Apache unit, Lt. Col. E., told Mako in a separate report. “Shooting at people in our territory – this is something I never thought I would do.”

Lt. Col. A., a reserve pilot in the same unit, described a fog of confusion: “I find myself in a dilemma as to what to shoot at, because there are so many of them.”
 
Correct but good luck getting anyone to pay any attention to this post.


I'm off to ex Twitter to get an opinion off someone else adopt it as my own and post it here.

At the very least a quote from some person who died 100 years ago to substantiate an opinion I borrow and use as if it's the truth :)
 
Here's a follow-up to the original Greyzone article that's caused the fuss.


Incidentally The Socialist Worker claims it was served with a D-Notice at the end of October to do with British special forces deploying to Israel.


You only have to read that Grayzone article to realise its lack of integrity. It takes snippets of what happened and attempts to piece together a narrative that almost suggests Hamas came over to southern Israel for a picnic and the IDF opened fire on everyone in sight whether Israeli or Palestinian. Unfortunately for the deniers multiple videos prove otherwise and somehow over 200 Israelis ended up in Gaza when Hamas finished their day out. Max Blumenthal is renowned for his hatred of Israel and will do or say anything to put them in a bad light. There’s enough real examples of the crimes of Netanyahu and his government without having to make up a whole conspiracy narrative based on a few actual isolated incidents reported in the Israeli press.
 
Well not really the evidence is in the billions of military aid our leaders send to Israel and the history of the wars we have waged in that region often failing in our aims miserably and destabilising the region but lining our own pockets in the process. The videos are just them letting the mask slip as they hide behind the vale of spreading democracy when usually in the public eye
The record is not good i grant you that, put you have to understand realpolitik that is practised by the West, everything that is done within the interests of the West or as the democratically elected governments think at the time and often they get it wrong, but often they get it right, the very fact you are sat there having this debate in relative freedom with a standard of living that is way better than the majority of the worlds population is proof positive
 
The record is not good i grant you that, put you have to understand realpolitik that is practised by the West, everything that is done within the interests of the West or as the democratically elected governments think at the time and often they get it wrong, but often they get it right, the very fact you are sat there having this debate in relative freedom with a standard of living that is way better than the majority of the worlds population is proof positive


Realism in Foreign Policy Analysis.​


"The relative size of a state’s material resources is likely to influence its ability to set agendas and influence specific decisions and outcomes in international affairs. And the nature of the strategic environment, most importantly whether the security and survival of the state is under immediate threat, is likely to influence the relative weight of domestic influences on foreign policy. In sum, great powers enjoy a bigger external action space in their foreign policies than weaker states, and secure states enjoy a bigger external action space in their foreign policies than insecure states."

and

"...offensive realists argue that only by creating an imbalance of power in its own favor will a state be able to maximize its security."
 
Here's a follow-up to the original Greyzone article that's caused the fuss.


Incidentally The Socialist Worker claims it was served with a D-Notice at the end of October to do with British special forces deploying to Israel.


These are really bizarre articles.

The first one has already been debunked as Apache footage that came from the Iraq war. It's very interesting in that it's quite clearly an anti-NATO website, go figure? In any event, militaries do not routinely release HUD footage one month after the event, especially sensitive footage which will be classified. It also mentions a Police report, the Police do not investigate military matters in most countries because militaries have their own Police.

If the Socialist Worker has been issued with a D-notice, so what? D-notices are routinely issued for sensitive military operations, this is to protect the people involved and not to cover anything up. Clearly the Socialist Worker doesn't give a shit about the wellbeing of British military personnel on operations.

On the last one, the RAF routinely flies throughout the area. The aircraft in question may be supplying aid or who knows what. I really don't see the point that is trying to be made? The UK supplies relatively limited arms to Israel and certainly munitions will not be supplied using RAF aircraft.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.