Middle East Conflict

I suppose it would be anti semitic to ask why the media in general give a more biased pov on the Israeli/Gazan conflict, considering we have a free press who dont see Israel as fundamental to the West influence in that region. Geniune question, or are you (or someone) going to close that down with anti semitic accusations? Its a real question, why do the media quite obviously not share the same disgust that we do? How does that work? (Btw I dont have the thoughts that Jews have permeated our society and are controlling everything - thats crazy shit).
When it comes to the media portrayal of the conflict, I think the relationship between Israel and Western interests is a big part of it. I also think a lot of it is simple racism - Palestinians, and Muslims in general, are dehumanised in European/American culture, and most of the media don't really seem to care about them as victims. Notice the way that the killing of Palestinian Christian civilians is somehow implied to be much worse than the killing of Palestinian Muslims. Another element is the tribalism of the UK media - if left wing protestors are against something then the Daily Mail is pretty much guaranteed to be for it. I don't think it's antisemitic in the slightest to ask why the media have the wrong view of this conflict (in my opinion, and yours); the issue is what answer one gives to that question.

Alternatively, isn't thinking of Israel as a puppet or client or vassal state of the USA (while denying it is) a bit antisemitic?
The Israel-US relationship is characterised by an unequal power dynamic, where the US has much more power. Their interests sometimes do not align, and the relationship is also subject to political dynamics internal to the two countries, but ultimately they both get something they want out of it. I'm not that bothered about terminology, but IMO "puppet" or "vassal" are inaccurate, and "client" probably is too.
 
Where a lot of people go wrong in answering this question is in the assumption that Israel is somehow getting the US (and the West in general) to do its bidding. As if that relatively small country and economy is pushing the world's leading superpower around. If anything it's actually the other way round: the US supports Israel because it's in the US' interests to do so. Israel is the major military power in a strategically key region. It's useful to the US. And, to a considerable extent, Israel still depends on the US for its military and especially diplomatic support.

That's not to say that Israel is the puppet of the US or the West, or to deny that it has its own interests and agendas which are sometimes at odds with those of the US. Nor is it to say that Israel is simply the creation of the West. It's just about recognising that the overall asymmetry of power in the US-Israel relationship is massively in the US' favour.

It's important to get this right, both because seeing where the power actually lies can help to end the current slaughter and eventually the illegal occupation, and also because myths of limitless Israeli power manipulating the West are where criticism of Israel sometimes does become antisemitism, in my view.
By that analysis, IDF are a more compliant terrorist force/sub contractor than Taliban against soviets in that part of the world.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.