I think this is a reasonable analogy but also shows up the whole problem for what it is. One side see's the Jewish immigrants as what Suella Braverman calls 'invaders' and the other side sees the Jewish immigrants as a desperate people fleeing persecution where 40% of their total number were eradicated from the planet. Now I think you can argue that fleeing to the Middle East is not much of an upgrade on what they received in 'civilised' Europe but I think they were desperate to find a place in the world where they were welcomed and could make a fist of defending themselves. Unluckily for the Palestinians it was there. There's that really good phrase with more than a grain of truth "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter". I think you could equally add "One man's invader is another man's immigrant looking for a safe place to live".