Middle East Conflict

[blue_paul]

One may ask what are children being placed there for surely not for petrol bomb throwers to hide behind i hope.

No, they shouldn't be shot dead by trained snipers regardless.

 

[cucumberman]

It’s absolutely wrong to target live rounds at children.

It’s also wrong for those responsible for the children to put them in harms way.

Any concrete evidence on this ? Or just speculation? Honest question.

 

[i kne albert davy]

No, they shouldn't be shot dead by trained snipers regardless.

No they shouldn't neither should they be put in the position to be shot at, I know if intended to attack armed troops I wouldn't have my kids with me.

 

[west didsblue]

Any concrete evidence on this ? Or just speculation? Honest question.

Maybe the fact that children are being killed or injured is concrete evidence of them being there. Or am I missing something from your question?

 

[The blue phantom]

Maybe the fact that children are being killed or injured is concrete evidence of them being there. Or am I missing something from your question?

Are they not allowed to protest?

It seems Tzviga Fogel has zero tolerance on on anyone even approaching the Fence.

As good as shoot to kill. Even on the unarmed.

 

[cucumberman]

Maybe the fact that children are being killed or injured is concrete evidence of them being there. Or am I missing something from your question?

Not really missing anything. I'm sure the bolded is obvious even though an M4A1 with sights can go 200m easy. So we are looking at children within a 200m radius of the shoote(s). But we are not talking about the children just being there. We are talking about children being human shields. was it speculated, or concluded because they were "there"?

 

[west didsblue]

Not really missing anything. I'm sure the bolded is obvious even though an M4A1 with sights can go 200m easy. So we are looking at children within a 200m radius of the shoote(s). But we are not talking about the children just being there. We are talking about children being human shields. was it speculated, or concluded because they were "there"?

I would have thought that putting children in that environment whether they are intentionally using them as human shields or not is putting them in harms way which was my original point.

 

[west didsblue]

Are they not allowed to protest?

It seems Tzviga Fogel has zero tolerance on on anyone even approaching the Fence.

As good as shoot to kill. Even on the unarmed.

I am not condoning the deliberate targeting of children if that’s what you’re implying. If that’s what’s happening then it’s totally wrong. If, as Fogel appears to be saying, anyone approaching the fence is being targeted because there is a concern they may be planting explosives there then it’s not so clear cut. We don’t have details of the circumstances surrounding the deaths of the children so it’s difficult to make a judgment.

 

[cucumberman]

I would have thought that putting children in that environment whether they are intentionally using them as human shields or not is putting them in harms way which was my original point.

Is there a documented report on this or was this also speculated. That the children are there because they have been "put" there is the only logical reason, or can there be other alternative reasons.

 

[Homar]

To those pointing out that Saudi Arabia is on the UN Human Rights Council, I should remind you that the only reason that they were admitted is because of backhand deals with the UK.