British occupation of India was primarily administrative with a economic motive. It was not colonised by settlers.
The Israeli situation is more skin to the formation of the USA and Australia where mass movement from Europe took place. These two places were lightly populated but still needed to be brought under control through violence.
Israel has a tougher job on its hands due to the shear number of Palestinians present. The stays quo has always been violence, sometimes more, sometimes less.
Living in a state where you know you're not wanted, have to build walls everywhere, and live in a highly charged atmosphere doesn't seem to me great.
It wasn't well thought out from the start and I consider it a failed experiment.
But the state of Israel exists and somehow the world has to resolve this. However with the parlous state of the leadership of Israel, Hamas, the US and to be frank the wider world, hope is in short supply.