Mike Riley

[bernabias home shirt]

Well really if they were asked not to publish it, maybe they shouldnt have made the meeting public knowledge on a city forum.

Only if you continue to not be able to put your brain in gear.

Here goes:

PB made the thread before he went as he had every intention (along with Bill and JMW) of giving details of what went on in the meeting (he had pm'd me earlier in the day yesterday to tell me to look out for the thread).

At the meeting, they were asked not to reveal the details, but the thread was already up and people asking questions. He then posted in the thread saying they were asked not to reveal what had gone on in detail.

It's not fucking rocket science but if you are still struggling, I shall try and break it down further for you.

Ok I take onboard that the thread was made prior to the meeting, fair enough. Well done on the pm as well.

Ignored my question though. I still think you would call someone out if they said they were going into a meeting regarding a major transfer and then turned round after and said sorry it was confidential. Maybe I'm wrong about that but I think your attitude would be different. It just this thread suits your agenda.

Maybe I could have another reply to tell me I'm thick and your ever so clever as well.

Was thinking that myself.

What the hell did he mention that for?

 

[Nascent Blues]

Only if you continue to not be able to put your brain in gear.

Here goes:

PB made the thread before he went as he had every intention (along with Bill and JMW) of giving details of what went on in the meeting (he had pm'd me earlier in the day yesterday to tell me to look out for the thread).

At the meeting, they were asked not to reveal the details, but the thread was already up and people asking questions. He then posted in the thread saying they were asked not to reveal what had gone on in detail.

It's not fucking rocket science but if you are still struggling, I shall try and break it down further for you.

Ok I take onboard that the thread was made prior to the meeting, fair enough. Well done on the pm as well.

Ignored my question though. I still think you would call someone out if they said they were going into a meeting regarding a major transfer and then turned round after and said sorry it was confidential. Maybe I'm wrong about that but I think your attitude would be different. It just this thread suits your agenda.

Maybe I could have another reply to tell me I'm thick and your ever so clever as well.

Was thinking that myself.

What the hell did he mention that for?

Well, it impressed me.

 

[SWP's back]

Well really if they were asked not to publish it, maybe they shouldnt have made the meeting public knowledge on a city forum.

Only if you continue to not be able to put your brain in gear.

Here goes:

PB made the thread before he went as he had every intention (along with Bill and JMW) of giving details of what went on in the meeting (he had pm'd me earlier in the day yesterday to tell me to look out for the thread).

At the meeting, they were asked not to reveal the details, but the thread was already up and people asking questions. He then posted in the thread saying they were asked not to reveal what had gone on in detail.

It's not fucking rocket science but if you are still struggling, I shall try and break it down further for you.

Ok I take onboard that the thread was made prior to the meeting, fair enough. Well done on the pm as well.

Ignored my question though. I still think you would call someone out if they said they were going into a meeting regarding a major transfer and then turned round after and said sorry it was confidential. Maybe I'm wrong about that but I think your attitude would be different. It just this thread suits your agenda.

Maybe I could have another reply to tell me I'm thick and your ever so clever as well.

They had never been asked not to publish details of these sort of meetings (all previous PpB and the like) before so why would they expect this one to be any different? A transfer meeting is nothing like this and of course one would expect total confidentiality.

I shall keep questioning your intelligence if you continue to ask bizarre questions.

Do you really think this thread by PB was a "look at me, aren't I special" thread?

And how does this thread suit "my agenda"? What is "my agenda"?

 

[Bill]

Well really if they were asked not to publish it, maybe they shouldnt have made the meeting public knowledge on a city forum.

Only if you continue to not be able to put your brain in gear.

Here goes:

PB made the thread before he went as he had every intention (along with Bill and JMW) of giving details of what went on in the meeting (he had pm'd me earlier in the day yesterday to tell me to look out for the thread).

At the meeting, they were asked not to reveal the details, but the thread was already up and people asking questions. He then posted in the thread saying they were asked not to reveal what had gone on in detail.

It's not fucking rocket science but if you are still struggling, I shall try and break it down further for you.

Could you explain it in the medium of expressionist dance
Failing that use Lego's

pmsl, post of the thread.

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Only if you continue to not be able to put your brain in gear.

Here goes:

PB made the thread before he went as he had every intention (along with Bill and JMW) of giving details of what went on in the meeting (he had pm'd me earlier in the day yesterday to tell me to look out for the thread).

At the meeting, they were asked not to reveal the details, but the thread was already up and people asking questions. He then posted in the thread saying they were asked not to reveal what had gone on in detail.

It's not fucking rocket science but if you are still struggling, I shall try and break it down further for you.

Ok I take onboard that the thread was made prior to the meeting, fair enough. Well done on the pm as well.

Ignored my question though. I still think you would call someone out if they said they were going into a meeting regarding a major transfer and then turned round after and said sorry it was confidential. Maybe I'm wrong about that but I think your attitude would be different. It just this thread suits your agenda.

Maybe I could have another reply to tell me I'm thick and your ever so clever as well.

They had never been asked not to publish details of these sort of meetings (all previous PpB and the like) before so why would they expect this one to be any different? A transfer meeting is nothing like this and of course one would expect total confidentiality.

I shall keep questioning your intelligence if you continue to ask bizarre questions.

Do you really think this thread by PB was a "look at me, aren't I special" thread?

And how does this thread suit "my agenda"? What is "my agenda"?

well it is PB so yes, it probably was ;).

 

[Hart of the Matter]

Started me thinking that if I had access to MR in a public forum what question would I reasonably ask that I could expect an answer to?
Not as easy as it sounds

 

[SWP's back]

Was thinking that myself.

What the hell did he mention that for?

To confirm PB's previous stated intent on giving the forum all the details of the meeting as opposed to him starting a thread saying "I know something you don't know". Again, I have to question whether people are being purposefully dim.

 

[Bill]

i think the best idea is that next time there is a pob meeting we get as many there as poss, if thats the critieria to attend follow on meetings.

 

[Matty]

Only if you continue to not be able to put your brain in gear.

Here goes:

PB made the thread before he went as he had every intention (along with Bill and JMW) of giving details of what went on in the meeting (he had pm'd me earlier in the day yesterday to tell me to look out for the thread).

At the meeting, they were asked not to reveal the details, but the thread was already up and people asking questions. He then posted in the thread saying they were asked not to reveal what had gone on in detail.

It's not fucking rocket science but if you are still struggling, I shall try and break it down further for you.

Could you explain it in the medium of expressionist dance
Failing that use Lego's

pmsl, post of the thread.

I'd love to see the chain of events expressed with the use of lego.

 

[SWP's back]

I'd love to see the chain of events expressed with the use of lego.

It would be difficult as I would imagine some of the pieces would end up being eaten by those upset with the thread.