Ducado
Well-Known Member
SWP's back said:Based on what research? It's just that up until 100 years or so ago, we were marrying off 12 and 13 year olds and have been doing for over 250,000 years.Ducado said:Skashion said:I really don't know if I can be arsed getting into this. It might be time to put on by bi-annual interest and fuck off rather than sketch out my vision of a libertarian society - with so much freedom most people would shit themselves.
To be honest I think you would change your opinion if you had children, I don't if you ever will (it's not my buisiness) but if you do you will realise that even the most mature of 15 year old girls are not capable of disentangling emotions, the guy should have known this
What about Spain with its age of consent of 13? Are they just savages?
-- Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:40 pm --
Second time I have seen this homophobic comment. Yes. I would, why wouldn't I? What point are you trying to make?BELLENDER said:If it had been a fithteen year old boy would you still think the same?Rascal said:So much of this debate in my opinion is about law and hard nosed facts.
But little has been said about the possibility that these two people are actually in love and clearly seeked to make a life together because of that.
If they are in love how can anyone moralise on there love.
I hope if they are they can weather the storm thats surrounding them and make a happy life together
You keep going on about the age of consent like if it was lower it would have been perfectly OK for a teacher to run off with one of his students!
The point about the age being lower in different eras was, it was about survival, women used to have 12 or 13 children they had to start early, it did not matter if they were mentally mature enough as long as they could give birth.