Missing Girl found, bloke arrested.

The cookie monster said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
The Flash said:
Nowt like a Bluemoon lynchmob to sort the world's ills.

And they are never wrong.
Except when they were queuing up to hang Jo Yeates' landlord for having a bad hair day and carrying a Waterstones bag.
But then being able to read must render someone suspicious when you have yet to discover the joys of opposable thumbs and walking upright.
Do you reckon he is doing a bit of porridge though nf?
Got £20 notes riding on this with swp.

Personally I reckon he will get about a year to 18 months for abduction of a minor.
Unless the girl admits sexual activity,he won't face charges for anything else,and I doubt she will.
 
ChrisNUFC said:
Also the fact he has already been convicted by the good members on here will save the tax payer the expense of the trial - which is nice

No need, he abducted a child, it's the law I really can't see why some people are getting so worked up about it
 
Ducado said:
ChrisNUFC said:
Also the fact he has already been convicted by the good members on here will save the tax payer the expense of the trial - which is nice

No need, he abducted a child, it's the law I really can't see why some people are getting so worked up about it

Me neither it's rather entertaining though!
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
The Flash said:
ChrisNUFC said:
Also the fact he has already been convicted by the good members on here will save the tax payer the expense of the trial - which is nice

Nowt like a Bluemoon lynchmob to sort the world's ills.

And they are never wrong.
Except when they were queuing up to hang Jo Yeates' landlord for having a bad hair day and carrying a Waterstones bag.
But then being able to read must render someone suspicious when you have yet to discover the joys of opposable thumbs and walking upright.

2 totally different scenarios though. Jumping to conclusions about the involvement of Jo Yeates' landlord in her murder because he was taken in for questioning is indeed out of order but I don't think it can be disputed that Forrest is involved with this current case though. And while we can only speculate about what has happened between him and Megan Stammers, what can't be argued is that he has at least committed some kind of crime by going on the run with a minor. And for that alone, people have a right to be critical of him.
 
Ducado said:
ChrisNUFC said:
Also the fact he has already been convicted by the good members on here will save the tax payer the expense of the trial - which is nice

No need, he abducted a child, it's the law I really can't see why some people are getting so worked up about it

Nobody is disputing the abduction.
But the Cellar brains trust have already convicted him as a paedophile without any evidence.
Some of us still believe that old fashioned notion about innocent until proved guilty.
 
I can't say I'm not disappointed. I wanted this to go on for a while and then channel 5 to send Gaza round Europe searching for them all the while being filmed.
 
Just discussing this in work - As the age on consent is 15 in France, IF he's had any relations with her while in France - Can he be charged for having sex with a minor under UK law?
 
BlueSniffer said:
Just discussing this in work - As the age on consent is 15 in France, IF he's had any relations with her while in France - Can he be charged for having sex with a minor under UK law?

I had sex with a miner once, she liked a good shaft down the pit.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.