Mixed teams could it/ will it happen

The nets aren't the issue, it's the goals that need shrinking. Although I suppose smaller goals would mean smaller nets?

The goals are the size set when a mans average height was the same as the average height of a woman now so they are not tòo big, they are just right.

I have never understood why this gets mentioned for the womens game, if anything the goals in the mens game need making bigger.
 
Is there any sport where women would beat men? For football no woman's team would beat any professional man's team. That being the case there's no argument for mixed teams.

Equestrian
Long distance Swimming
Cross country
Free diving
Cycling
Discus

In fact it has been shown women are better at most endurance sports.
 
Equestrian
Long distance Swimming
Cross country
Free diving
Cycling
Discus

In fact it has been shown women are better at most endurance sports.
I’ll have to take your word for it, but doesn’t the horse do all the work in Equestrian.

Also, ‘most’ endurance sports?
 
Equestrian
Long distance Swimming
Cross country
Free diving
Cycling
Discus

In fact it has been shown women are better at most endurance sports.

Nope, not having that.

Elite women marathon runners are about 15 minutes behind the men..... can’t be arsed checking the others but I think the discus thrown by women is half the weight of the one thrown by men.....

Edit: had a quick look at cross country, men race 2km further
 
Nope, not having that.

Elite women marathon runners are about 15 minutes behind the men..... can’t be arsed checking the others but I think the discus thrown by women is half the weight of the one thrown by men.....

Edit: had a quick look at cross country, men race 2km further

Men are faster, that isn't even questionable, I said womem are better and when it's been tested women perform better in sports that last longer while men will tire quicker and take longer to recover, female athletes can carry on linger and race/compete quicker as they recover must faster.

It isn't always about the winning, but about the play itself.

Men are better at short time sports, but women last longer over time.

Bit like shagging I suppose most blokes are in and out in half an hour while a lass can carry on a bit longer ;-)
 
Men are faster, that isn't even questionable, I said womem are better and when it's been tested women perform better in sports that last longer while men will tire quicker and take longer to recover, female athletes can carry on linger and race/compete quicker as they recover must faster.

It isn't always about the winning, but about the play itself.

Men are better at short time sports, but women last longer over time.

Bit like shagging I suppose most blokes are in and out in half an hour while a lass can carry on a bit longer ;-)

Half an hour? Does that include dinner and a few drinks? :-)

I still can’t agree with you, men are put together differently and are more suited to physical activity and will out perform women in strength, speed and endurance.
 
Men are faster, that isn't even questionable, I said womem are better and when it's been tested women perform better in sports that last longer while men will tire quicker and take longer to recover, female athletes can carry on linger and race/compete quicker as they recover must faster.

It isn't always about the winning, but about the play itself.

Men are better at short time sports, but women last longer over time.

Bit like shagging I suppose most blokes are in and out in half an hour while a lass can carry on a bit longer ;-)
Surely the whole point of endurance sport is to run further? Therefore men are better at cross country as they run 2km further?

Was naughty of you to put discus in there if they’re a lot lighter.

So if men are faster and run further, can you qualify how women are, in your words, “better” and in which particular endurance sports.
 
Surely the whole point of endurance sport is to run further? Therefore men are better at cross country as they run 2km further?

Was naughty of you to put discus in there if they’re a lot lighter.

So if men are faster and run further, can you qualify how women are, in your words, “better” and in which particular endurance sports.


I have explained what I meant by endurance and don't feel the need to repeat myself.

Also not interested in a back and forth over a subject I really don't care about.

Original post will we see a mixed football team, answer no .
 
Doubt it, the genetics are too heavily weighted in favour of the lads. How many women would make it into the average XI? 1? Not enough. Can't think of a mixed sex sport where there isn't some form of handicap.
I wouldn't say even 1 tbh.
The women's game is relatively new. I'm really happy that it is now getting the recognition it deserves, however, in addition to genetics the men's game is advanced. Men, in general, will always have more power, pace, strength etc but the way players are developed from a really early age means that the women's game has a long way to go until it can catch up.
Then, there's the ratio of men to women. How many boys at school dreamt of being a footballer and carried a ball around with them everywhere they went? Compare that to the girls.The sudden boom in women's football probably means there's more girls playing now. There's probably all girls games kicking off in the playgrounds, however, will there ever be as many girls obsessed with being a footballer as boys? And, how many of them boys actually make it? I hope the women's game continues to grow but there will never be fully mixed teams. It wouldn't work. The sudden boom in women's football as brought about this question, but will there ever be mixed cricket, boxing, rugby, basketball, athletics, netball.....?
 
Doubt it, the genetics are too heavily weighted in favour of the lads. How many women would make it into the average XI? 1? Not enough. Can't think of a mixed sex sport where there isn't some form of handicap.
Equestrianism (including horse racing), ‘indoor sports’ like darts and snooker and sailing are mixed with no handicap.
 
Equestrianism (including horse racing), ‘indoor sports’ like darts and snooker and sailing are mixed with no handicap.

To be more precise there is the fallback of competing in the women only events if they get knocked out of the male competitions, snooker for example has a womens world champion who has won the title 12 years in a row but hasn't made an impact at all in the mens game, same for darts really. If we remove the female versions of sports and just allow all people regardless of gender to compete against each other they we are left with men winning most if not everything in sight.
If we genuinely want to see sport mixed and for that mixing to herald in a new meritocracy then we have to just have a world championship of any sport and none that only one sex can enter in to.
 
It worked fine for the soccer aid game,the women held their own,it'll never happen in the prem because the FOC's in the suits wouldn't let it,several of our womens team could play with us,it won't happen anyway,too much misogine(sp) to let it happen
there isn't one single woman anywhere in the world that could play for our first team and to think 2 or 3 of our womens team would get a game is absolutely ridiculous
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top