Mancini’s Pastilles
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jun 2019
- Messages
- 2,530
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Signing Bowen would be just signing Grealish all over again
Roger that.And you could add Palmer to that list.
It wouldn’t, he’s got an eye for goal and paceSigning Bowen would be just signing Grealish all over again
Yeah, Bowen is class. He’d do far more in a City team than Kudus. He’s like Doku where his highlights real looks great.Bowen is a more complete team player. We’ve spent plenty on shite with no resale value so i don’t think a 28 year old proven player would be a problem in our current stateGot season ticket mates at the Hammers, know some others too, most agree Bowen is the better player even if Kudus is the more talented
They say he has a worldie in him, and can dribble past half a team but he goes down blind alleys, often goes for goal when a better option is available, runs down blind alleyways, can be lazy, makes stupid challenges when running back
Bowen isn't as flashy but he's a 7/10 player, gives his all is always a threat, makes intelligent runs, brings the team up the pitch, scores and assists regularly, is their penalty taker, covers more ground than anyone on the pitch, fittest on the team, does the defensive work
So yea, it's up for debate unless you go off twitter fans saying who's better for YouTube highlight reels instead dof watching 90 minutes
No Emerson/LakeRoger that.
or kudus tbf.We're not signing Bowen ffs
Wanna make it clear, dont think we should be signing Bowen because of his age & cost, and while I rate him and think he'd add a lot to us, it's only now when we are in a poor position, we should be aiming higher for what he'd costYeah, Bowen is class. He’d do far more in a City team than Kudus. He’s like Doku where his highlights real looks great.Bowen is a more complete team player. We’ve spent plenty on shite with no resale value so i don’t think a 28 year old proven player would be a problem in our current state