Morgan Gibbs-White

This is known as FFS syndrome.
It affects those fans who do not like players until they play elsewhere, whereupon they become the perfect fit for our team. It can affect the opinion of potential signings, or players of the club who leave for a new team.
It was most eloquently demonstrated with successive replacements for Riyad Mahrez deemed as not fit to lace his boots despite relentless criticism of the player while he was here.
There is no cure and those affected cannot contain their symptoms.


The most underrated player to have played for us. People carry on about Sane but this guy was levels above him.
 
Sami Mokbel was on Monday Night Club with Chappers and he said MGW had a release clause in his contract that was confidential.
Spurs then offered this and Forest are furious and are taking legal action cos no-one knew, except those connected to the player, about the clause, apparently.

Chappers said he had so many questions but thought he might be in trouble...
 
The way I am looking at it now every club knows 60 million is the release. If another club offers it will they now accept it or just refuse to let him go for that fee. He had a good season last season but so had loads of players but couldn't back it up long term.
 
Sami Mokbel was on Monday Night Club with Chappers and he said MGW had a release clause in his contract that was confidential.
Spurs then offered this and Forest are furious and are taking legal action cos no-one knew, except those connected to the player, about the clause, apparently.

Chappers said he had so many questions but thought he might be in trouble...
Imagine signing a contract with a release clause that's confidential. I'd be getting a new agent/advisor if I was him.
 
Imagine signing a contract with a release clause that's confidential. I'd be getting a new agent/advisor if I was him.
That's what Chappers was inferring, I think.
He did actually ask, 'what's the point of a release clause?'

I think Forest's argument is/was, that question should/could have been asked at board level, but Spurs went straight in with a bid, that suggests they knew the amount.
 
That's what Chappers was inferring, I think.
He did actually ask, 'what's the point of a release clause?'

I think Forest's argument is/was, that question should/could have been asked at board level, but Spurs went straight in with a bid, that suggests they knew the amount.
Or maybe it’s what they thought he is worth?
 
That's what Chappers was inferring, I think.
He did actually ask, 'what's the point of a release clause?'

I think Forest's argument is/was, that question should/could have been asked at board level, but Spurs went straight in with a bid, that suggests they knew the amount.
That would be a very sly and Levy thing to do. The man is an utter shit! Be fucking hilarious if we came in and took him from under his slimy big dishonest nose.
 
Surely Spurs can just say they guessed and it can’t be disproved?

Hope Forest stand their ground though, fuck Levy

Now that his release clause is public, is there any obstacle to any other club activating it?
 
It's fucking fantastic that the tables have been turned on Levy and Spurs.

That **** Levy has caused City lots of trouble, as well as stopping Kane from joining City.
Too true. I was absolutely appalled at the arrogance of how he wanted/ thinks Spuds will win the PL when the new manager was announced. Just who the fkeck does he think he is??? Absolute shyster imo, ceo of a club punching above their weight to be playing with the big boys. Two trophies in 17 years, I mean come on.

I hope MGW goes anywhere but there.

Hated Spuds since 1981.
 
Surely Spurs can just say they guessed and it can’t be disproved?

Hope Forest stand their ground though, fuck Levy

Now that his release clause is public, is there any obstacle to any other club activating it?
I mean if they offered the amount of 60m flat they can’t really say it was a guess. RCs don’t have add ons typically but normal deals do
 
That's what Chappers was inferring, I think.
He did actually ask, 'what's the point of a release clause?'

I think Forest's argument is/was, that question should/could have been asked at board level, but Spurs went straight in with a bid, that suggests they knew the amount.
It’s an agent’s job to tout his player, should that player want to move.

It’s not against the rules for that agent to chat with other clubs.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top