MOTD

[mancunial]

Lambert a under pressure now, well if he hadn't bent over over for the scum then who knows,

 

[Summerbuzz]

I bet i'm the most sober person here tonight, so take my word for it, it was fair coverage ;)

What does sober mean?

miserable covers it well enough

 

[pudge]

Rodgers said he had an "overriding feeling of proudness"

While Martinez says he "couldn't be prouder"

Which one's first language is English?...

 

[momo88]

Rodgers said he had an "overriding feeling of proudness"

While Martinez says he "couldn't be prouder"

Which one's first language is English?...

hhaha terrrrific

 

[eyejay51]

Lambert a under pressure now, well if he hadn't bent over over for the scum then who knows,

Could do with subtitles when he's interviewed ... what language is that ???

 

[oakiecokie]

Lambert a under pressure now, well if he hadn't bent over over for the scum then who knows,

Could do with subtitles when he's interviewed ... what language is that ???

I think its the language of bollocks. ;)

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Lambert a under pressure now, well if he hadn't bent over over for the scum then who knows,

Could do with subtitles when he's interviewed ... what language is that ???

Didn't pick up one bloody word from the whole interview.

 

[Pigeonho]

There's a lot of paranoia on this thread

It's great.
Nothing wrong with that last night at all. I watched the United highlights after and Rooney's volley got labeled as 'the goal'. If Aguero had netted that and it was referred to so lightly as 'the goal', I think there would have been a couple of heart attacks on here, maybe even as people typed. Something like 'did you hear that fucking **** then, no credit whatseklnknj.knbhb;hbjknlnk'.
Our match was covered as much as they could cover it in the time they had for each game. It's bordering on the extreme now though, the criticism the programme gets. It's as if people are just coming up with the slightest thing to get all upset and mard about. Like i've said before, fans of other teams visiting this forum must think we have the softest bunch of fans in the land. Moaning about every thing to do with the media/MOTD/Sky. Poor.

 

[squirtyflower]

There's a lot of paranoia on this thread

It's great.
Nothing wrong with that last night at all. I watched the United highlights after and Rooney's volley got labeled as 'the goal'. If Aguero had netted that and it was referred to so lightly as 'the goal', I think there would have been a couple of heart attacks on here, maybe even as people typed. Something like 'did you hear that fucking **** then, no credit whatseklnknj.knbhb;hbjknlnk'.
Our match was covered as much as they could cover it in the time they had for each game. It's bordering on the extreme now though, the criticism the programme gets. It's as if people are just coming up with the slightest thing to get all upset and mard about. Like i've said before, fans of other teams visiting this forum must think we have the softest bunch of fans in the land. Moaning about every thing to do with the media/MOTD/Sky. Poor.

I wondered when you would come out
I've just got up and read the thread from the start of last night
I'd say at a conservative guess that about 80% of the posts said that the coverage was fair. However, as always, you pick out a negative post so that you can have yet another go at City fans in general, your reason d'être
You just troll threads looking for some negative so you can have a go at 'fellow' blues, and that is trolling and against the CoC

 

[Pigeonho]

There's a lot of paranoia on this thread

It's great.
Nothing wrong with that last night at all. I watched the United highlights after and Rooney's volley got labeled as 'the goal'. If Aguero had netted that and it was referred to so lightly as 'the goal', I think there would have been a couple of heart attacks on here, maybe even as people typed. Something like 'did you hear that fucking **** then, no credit whatseklnknj.knbhb;hbjknlnk'.
Our match was covered as much as they could cover it in the time they had for each game. It's bordering on the extreme now though, the criticism the programme gets. It's as if people are just coming up with the slightest thing to get all upset and mard about. Like i've said before, fans of other teams visiting this forum must think we have the softest bunch of fans in the land. Moaning about every thing to do with the media/MOTD/Sky. Poor.

I wondered when you would come out
I've just got up and read the thread from the start of last night
I'd say at a conservative guess that about 80% of the posts said that the coverage was fair. However, as always, you pick out a negative post so that you can have yet another go at City fans in general, your reason d'être
You just troll threads looking for some negative so you can have a go at 'fellow' blues, and that is trolling and against the CoC

Not really petal. What it is, is finding it piss poor that there was anything at all to have a go at MOTD about last night, and having an opinion on that. Those who said it was poor have a right to post their opinions, course they do, but then so do I in reply. 'Trolling' is what children do, based on my admittedly limited knowledge on what the term means. having an opinion on something is what the forum is for. I could say 'MOTD is dead dead mean to us and is hosted by meanies who don't likey us and i'm dead dead upset about it and i'm gonna come on here to say how dead dead upset I am before I cry into my already-drenched City teddy', and be one of the sheep. But that wouldn't be what the forum is for would it - voicing my own opinion.
Cheers though for your comments, Squirt.