Mourinho 3 Champions League Medals

[Romford Pele]

That was essentially Mancini's team who he guided to the final last night.
Mancini tried and failed (miserably) to answer the Gallianis' wish over 3 or 4 years (i forget the timescale).
In comes Mourinho and BAM!
Your wish is my command.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

I don't care about being popular. We've had thirty years of that and I reckon it's over-rated. I don't know whether we're in with a chance of bringing Mourinho here, but one thing I do know for sure is that if he did and he put that first trophy in the cabinet, every single poster on this Forum tonight who've been giving it large about what a twat Mourinho is will be singing 'Jose Mourinho, Jose Mourinho' with gusto!

I think we'd only struggle to get Jose if Real Madrid came in for him, which they may well do the way things are going. I think Utd and Liverpool are non starters and I don't think he'll stay in Milan. Jose and City are a match made in heaven if you ask me. City and Jose can eclipse those fornicators from across the road for a generation. Open your minds.

People seem to have short memories. The fallout with the Hughes v Mancini episode was something. A 'match made in heaven' will never be further from the reality if Jose came to CoMS. The internal strife would make The Somme look like a walk along the prom at Blackpool.

His career at MCFC would be characterised by him alienating one set of people after another until it was just 'Jose against the world'. He would be sacked within 18mths.

And to top that, I've just heard him on the Chris Evans Show, and he's a dead sounder for one of those meerkats.

 

[browha]

I'm not a city fan but I couldn't help but stumble onto this forum from the internet.

Lets get some facts straight, since a once-over makes it immediately appear that a lot of people posting in this thread have no clue about Inter at all.

Romford Pele...
That was essentially Mancini's team who he guided to the final last night.
Mancini tried and failed (miserably) to answer the Gallianis' wish over 3 or 4 years (i forget the timescale).
In comes Mourinho and BAM!
Your wish is my command.

1) Adriano Galliani has nothing to do with Inter. You'll find he's the vice-president and operating Chairman of AC Milan. WHOOPS!

2) Mancini's team? Erroneous. Five of the eleven starters were signed by Mourinho (namely Lucio, Sneijder, Milito, Eto'o, and Thiago Motta). Coincidentally, two of them were goalscorers in the first leg. Pandev, who started the previous leg, is also a Mourinho signing - as is Muntari and Mariga, who both played in the second leg.

Just because Mancini said the team was 90% his, doesn't make it true! If you looked at the deadweight Mancini loved that Mourinho shipped out, you will see how this team changed. (Adriano, Ibrahimovic, Crespo, Suazo, Dacourt, Vieira, the list goes on)

bizzbo
do you rate ancelotti as highly as mou? if not, why?

Because that's not all the facts. Yes, Ancelotti has won the CL twice and got to the final at least one more time, but his league title record in Italy was dreadful, winning once or twice (I don't remember off hand). If you look at Mourinho's record, he's won the league every year since Porto except for one year with Chelsea.

Mourinho is also substantially younger, so yes, I do rate Mourinho higher than Ancelotti.

By Bazzmand Show and others


Here here. Inter Milan with the players they have are more than capable of at least putting some sort of attack against Barca. Are people telling me Sneidjer, Cambiasso, Motta, Zanetti, Eto'o and Stankovic are in the class of Stoke? That they need to hoof the ball and could only manage 67 passes in a game which is an absolute pisstake. Dont care for it personally. Give me Barcelona attacking football everyday of the week. 2 Champions league trophies in 3 years is testament to the fact that you usually win as a result of playing well.

I'd love to see many teams survive a man down against Barcelona. Also, did you not see the first leg? It could have easily been 5-1. So, yes, Barcelona are still undoubtedly the best passers in the world, but they were played off the pitch in the first leg, and they can pass all they want, but they didn't look very effective up front until the last few minutes. I'd rather ten passes and a goal than twenty and none.


To those critics who are calling Inter boring:

1) This has been one of our most entertaining seasons. Between having scored more goals than any other team in the league (68 vs Roma next at 62), and having beaten teams such as AC Milan 4-0 and 2-0 with 9 men, Genoa 5-0, Palermo 5-3, Siena 4-3 with an epic loss converted to win in 5 minutes comeback... It has been a fantastic season.

2) The only spell this season in which we have been boring was from approximately the Chelsea tie (not that tie itself but as a reference to date, where our league form dropped massively) until approximately the Barcelona tie. We had quite a few 0-0 draws in that time, but outside of that the rest of the season has been prolific.

3) Watch some Maicon goals from this season, you'll be dazzled. His Juventus one was particularly fantastic.


Any more comments?!


Edit:

Oh, one more thing.

My 'boring' team has scored more league goals in less games than your, presumably 'unboring' team have.