You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Mourinho or Mancini
- Thread starter Champions2012!
- Start date
blue order
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 506
I think game playing is afoot. All this Mourinho want City job etc is crap I think and a way to make United bust a gut to get him like they did Van Persie.
I can see Ronaldo going with him to United in a blaze of publicity as ludicrous as the financial situation/argument against it is.
I can see Ronaldo going with him to United in a blaze of publicity as ludicrous as the financial situation/argument against it is.
Champions2012! said:Now that it's official and Mou won't be managing Real next season, would you rather have him managing City or Mancini?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.marca.com/2012/12/03/en/football/real_madrid/1354524368.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.marca.com/2012/12/03/en/foot ... 24368.html</a>
Mancini for me.
Your English has improved again...
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
crystal_mais said:ban-mcfc said:mourinho is the dogs bollocks. he would certainly improve us.
the problems for me are....
1. would he do a runner after 3/4 seasons and leave us at square one again?
2. mancini has won 2 titles in three years and deserves time, why keep chopping and changing managers? he clear didn't bring in the players he wanted in the summer.
3. will mourinho take care of the academy and develop us for the future or is he just a short term fix?
i'm looking at the next 10 years, not 3.
i'll stick with mancini.
Quick question - in the last 3 years how much has Mancini improved the academy and how many academy players are now playing for the 1st team?
good point.
Of course Mancini is not interested in our academy - he wants to buy two top strikers every window!crystal_mais said:ban-mcfc said:mourinho is the dogs bollocks. he would certainly improve us.
the problems for me are....
1. would he do a runner after 3/4 seasons and leave us at square one again?
2. mancini has won 2 titles in three years and deserves time, why keep chopping and changing managers? he clear didn't bring in the players he wanted in the summer.
3. will mourinho take care of the academy and develop us for the future or is he just a short term fix?
i'm looking at the next 10 years, not 3.
i'll stick with mancini.
Quick question - in the last 3 years how much has Mancini improved the academy and how many academy players are now playing for the 1st team?
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Timmmmahhhh said:ban-mcfc said:mourinho is the dogs bollocks. he would certainly improve us.
the problems for me are....
1. would he do a runner after 3/4 seasons and leave us at square one again?
2. mancini has won 2 titles in three years and deserves time, why keep chopping and changing managers? he clear didn't bring in the players he wanted in the summer.
3. will mourinho take care of the academy and develop us for the future or is he just a short term fix?
i'm looking at the next 10 years, not 3.
i'll stick with mancini.
I'll agree with this, depsite the poor grammar and punctuation.
say what now?
Didsbury Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2007
- Messages
- 38,062
blue order said:I think game playing is afoot. All this Mourinho want City job etc is crap I think and a way to make United bust a gut to get him like they did Van Persie.
I can see Ronaldo going with him to United in a blaze of publicity as ludicrous as the financial situation/argument against it is.
Maybe that's true, especially as City's situation has changed.
Problem is, if that happens and we stick with Mancini, then we are condemned to perennial runners up. Not something I relish, and not something The Sheikh should relish. Maybe City's board may fear that more than anything.