1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 15,331
I wonder who wrote the system design and specifications.
And who signed them off.
And who signed them off.
What’s being said mate as I mentioned this earlier on in the thread ?
It's not a clarkie. It didn't originally exist, the system just suddenly decided there was a deficit when there wasn't so the post masters had to stump up the money thus swelling the post offices coffers.I meant the money originally flagged as missing. - Unless I've been Clarkied.
Isn’t that theft? Seems like “an intention to permanently deprive” to meThis is raised in one of the later programmes.
They say all the money that the post masters paid would have gone in a holding account and when it wasn't claimed back would have just gone into the profits of the post office. Cunts.
It should but it probably won’t. I’d love to see Paula Vennells get jail time. From vicar to prisonerlast week Post Office
"we didn't know - nobody told us - can't remember "
Fujitsu today
" there were bugs since the launch - we told the Post Office"
Fuck me this could lead to some prosecutions
It should but it probably won’t. I’d love to see Paula Vennells get jail time. From vicar to prisoner
It is, some fuckers need to be sent down for it.Isn’t that theft? Seems like “an intention to permanently deprive” to me
Is proving the dishonesty that’s the challenge.Isn’t that theft? Seems like “an intention to permanently deprive” to me
It should but it probably won’t. I’d love to see Paula Vennells get jail time. From vicar to prisoner
Agreed but hopefully someone gets in there and looks at board minutes, emails, management meeting minutes etc, I am sure there’ll be some incriminating stuff if they care to look, but whether the establishment goes hard after the establishment is doubtfulIs proving the dishonesty that’s the challenge.